It’s a Mk.4
1 Like
They’re GE premiums (unless you want to wait for the 5 millenias that it takes to research one) that don’t go on sale and for which you need to grind modules and buy a talisman, they’re the perfect money-making vehicles
(And don’t tell little Timy about research effectiveness dropping when you have more than 1 tier difference, else he won’t use his mom’s credit card as much)
It was only a one-off prototype which tested Meteor aswell so consider it as possible event vehicle in the future. Di is a much better option for the techtree.
And the IR-OTIS can be added in the future as well. Its not one or the other.
1 Like
Yes, this will all be explained in the in-game event description.
Feel free to submit a suggestion for the aircraft or leave feedback for it in the update changelog discussion. However this doesn’t seem like something suitable to the main tree on the surface.
4 Likes
Hey. If we have new news on any subjects on the Dev server to share, we for sure will.
Right now it’s still open and the Devs are still reviewing feedback, actioning reports and continuing to work on the update itself.
3 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Are you able to bump these bug reports so that the devs take a look at them? The issues of HUDs missing radar symbology has been going on for a while but these reports don’t seem to have been looked at in some time. Missing HUD radar symbology is a massive issue for Sim players and it would be nice to see atleast some of these get fixed.
AV-8B Plus
J-10A and JF-17
JA37D/C (Also Di on Dev server)
It would be especially nice if the Ja37 report would be worked on given that the JA37Di is intended to come in the next major update
3 Likes
Hey. We will take a look at them, but any HUDs not already planned for the update or already in progress likely will not be possible for this major. The team already have existing tasks there for HUD updates. Some of which are already on Dev or in progress.
So it is being considered?
As I said, the Devs are reviewing feedback and reports from the Dev server as a whole. That was not spesific to any one part of the update. Simply we don’t have answers to every subject currently that we haven’t already answered on stream / here.
understood
Sounds like a no tbh
I get that they might be getting worked on but each of these reports were made when the aircrafts first came out. Why not finish the aircraft before adding them? Like it took the bullet count being off by 1 in the AV-8B Plus HUD nearly a year after the AV-8B Plus was first added. It just seems that most of the issues would be fixed quicker if they were worked on when first reported, not kick it down the road to solve in the future.
By ignoring simple issues for months/years it just creates a backpiling of issues which take longer and longer to fix.
Let me be devil’s advocate for a moment, this is a minor bug with little to no impact on gameplay. On the other hand I can name several bugs with massive gameplay consequences that have gone unfixed for years and remain so to this day.
Yeah that one is a small one but also it should be an incredibly simple problem to fix, but yet it took a whole year to fix.
Other issues like missing radar symbology or broken gunsights should be a priority given their impact on the game for Sim players
Maybe there’s some code spaghetti or something that complicates things.
I’m not a programmer though, so fair enough
1 Like
So a new Pakistan helicopter, watch it go to China if it does then this is proof they don’t need Singapore and Indonesia
7 Likes
I just noticed this. Release 2024-11-1?
That means release next week. I was hoping for a release on wednesday. Oh well. I hope the change their minds on the F-15E engines until it’s too late.
I wouldn’t say that just yet. Mainly because if we just accept it it’s basically guaranteed they’ll do that, but if we don’t and try to fight it there’s at least a chance they’ll do the right thing instead.
4 Likes