Also no GBU-16 (only -12), no GBU-48, no GBU-22, and no ASPTT.
Hello @Smin1080p_WT
Sorry for the ping but is the M2K’s RMV weaponry set to evolve, or is it what we should expect on the live server ?
Yes
I nearly forgot, no external wing-mounted fuel tanks.
GR.1 is not GR.4. PGM was tested on Tornado GR.1. Not on IDS. Not on GR.4. Why GR.4 has PGM?
@Smin1080p_WT are the LJDAMs on the Tornado ASSTA 1 being added for the time being till we have an ASSTA 3/ 3.1?
Because lets call it, ASSTA1 werent the best at using then or is it an balancing decision
Also, will we get the Laser for the LJDAM or just GPS guidence?
2 Likes
9P on the Matador
Spoiler
2 Likes
GR.4 is a development of GR.1 hence capability is retained
1 Like
More destroyers shall suffer the wrath.
(I say this though im writing a suggestion for a British destroyer that got refitted with these same mounts iirc)
1 Like
The LJDAM didn’t even enter service with the US until 2012.
GR.4 is an upgraded GR.1.
5 Likes
Too bad its rank 2 imo
It would have been a specially modified GR1 though, and it wouldn’t have carried over to the GR4 since it was never adopted for service.
2 Likes
Preach. I would probably start spending my own money on the game again and get back to >80h / week like I used to, instead of the current <20h / week.
2 Likes
Man the 1st Person View and now 3rd Person view is so awesome, gives you really a sense of Scale for these things
But why is the Option not present for Naval this time or am i just blind and can’t find the dude ?
And its such a shame this isn’t permanent
9 Likes
We have a Dev blog planned for this vehicle that will cover it’s weaponary.
13 Likes
the second one looks cool!
seems like the Indian one also got some new skins.