I wasnt talking about ARH deployment but purely SARH. Stronger lock means stronger signal and stronger signal means stronger return waves. That translates to smaller notch window aswell as more accurate and visible “painting” of the target which is essential for SARH missiles.
So no, despite AIM-7 limitations F-2A would’ve been way stronger than any of its competition of the time and SARH missiles fired from it would’ve been way harder to defeat. Thats in a sense of pre-ARH addition
Is it just me or is all the aircraft on the dev server really reflective?
GR1
IDS
quite a few differences. And quite major ones considering the systems
@Smin1080p_WT can you say why the hell we get now an Premium Su-22M4 (WTD61)?
Like, is this to get some money and then boost the Development of an new TT Tornado for Germany or what is this?
Does it may get stuff which is currently notbon dev?
Edit:
When Premium
Mig-29G (WTD61)
F-4F ICE (WTD61)
…
Nothing that would affect its ability to guide a PGM. that thing highlighted in red is a laser rangfinder I believe.
And PGM was manufactured by who?
MBDA
complete sentence
Won’t make any real difference.
So the CV90 is british now?
LJDAM :)))))
Ja es ist ein satz
Oh, they took pity on us.
Regular JDAM atm
Yea yea
Sadly more too it than that. British variants diverge from the standard IDS.
BAE systems (MBDA UK)
That doesn’t explain where our own improved CAS options are, like HOSBO
Or the twin PARS 3 launchers for the outer Tiger pylons, which was requested years ago.
What people forget is this is the smaller October/November update, before the big end of year one. Its never going to be massively unique content-wise.
