Gives me hope for F-2A in December :D
14 Likes
They do, but at it current moment is completely unusable, it overcorrects way to hard
1 Like
Please… weve been waiting so long…
3 Likes
I am curious if we got the MMEV at some point who would actually get it? because it is a Canadian vic and uses the ADATS system on a LAV 3 hull that is a domestic hull.
on one hand the system is American but was never adopted by them where it was adopted by the Canadians and the UK currently has the CANDATS, it wouldnt really be better then the normal ADATS for anti air but would make for a fun anti tank system (unless they give it IRIS-T)
12 Likes
You want it for AA (maybe not lol) I want it for funny AT we are not the same (funny Hydra ADATS)
A. It was the replacement for the ADATS so it should either go after the Canadian ADATS in-game or be saved for a Canadian TT.
B. It actually a heavily modified ADATS turret that could fire more than just the base ADATS missile. but things like a guided version of Canada’s domestic rocket: CVR-7, along with other missile types.
3 Likes
If thats the case then i still dont understand why an XF-2A/F-2A early with just sparrows was too.much for the game…even more so now that they admit AESA wont even truly be AESA.
17 Likes
+1,000,000,000,000 for the UK. The title for the 2A4 isn’t called Royal Canadian for nothing.
Ehhhh exhale
I more mean the missile I know the system itself was heavily modified to be able to carry a lot of other weapons
am i the only one wondering where the fuc the tgp is for the su 34? or any god damn russian aircraft that should get one for that matter? because i havent seen that riot for a while
1 Like
ADATS is Swiss.
It’s armament is already overpowered enough. It doesn’t need a TGP too.
100% agree, the only problem with the F2 besides the radar (which is an easy fix clearly) will be its flight performance but even then thats assuming they wont nerf it
3 Likes
Fret no longer the British are getting it too
Yeah… Probably wont use it though, Stormer HVM and Stormer AD are probably better for 10.3 But OSA can replace ADATS at 11.7
The devblog abt the KV-7 U-13 came a little bit earlier than the previous two Dreams come true, those weren’t until the 31st while the KV-7 got it 's own on the 25th.
The parallel events of past years anniversaries weren’t announced until the 8th and 3rd of Nov. respectively, if there 's another one this year maybe it’ll be earlier than those - at least, it 's not likely to be later.
Same. It also confirms what we assumed in that P/AESA is “nerfed” and won’t be as OP as people claim.
I really really really hope we’ll see the Viper Zero in a couple months time…
My guess is they’re taking their time with Japan since we don’t have as many options as US and RU to dump an aircraft in every update. They could also have been waiting for systems to make the F-2 an actual multi-role with L-JDAMs and such only found on the later variants. Plus with all these AGM munitions, maybe ASM could be an option.
It has to be better than the F-16C as the airframe is a direct successor. The only thing it was worse at was pure T/W (marginally) and top speed due to drag (again marginal decrease).
9 Likes
I would say they are equal because the ADATS is smaller and bedder in AT and the OSA excells in AA but its larger then ouer Barn and worse in selfdefence against tanks
Both are realistically DOA if a tank shoots at you and personally I find the ADATS jsut cant kill most top tier tanks wihtout firing 2 or 3 missiles.
But the extra 0.5km range might push it ahead. But probably wont use it either way