Not realy:
A: you used the wrong shell (DM33/DM53)
B: 966 is better than 534
So, Try again :)
:(
@Smin1080p_WT can I ask what source is being used to limit the range of the brimstones to 15 km as every where I have looked says 20km from fixed wing planes
It got allready reported
Well I just want to know how they managed.to get it wrong in the first place
Ngl I doubt it’ll get passed
They seem extremely adamant on their brimstone choices
Spoiler: you wont get an answer for that ))
Well, its allready passed…
Fair enough I shouldve looked lmfao
I don’t think we’re getting any answers this weekend
There’s gonna be a helluva backlog to address on monday :P
I feel bad for them but at the same time this push back shouldve been more than expected for the brimstones
I know all we need to do is sell some to the Russians and suddenly it will get all its features
The AP shell had so much HE filler it can be considered a SAPCBC round. Though seems to be underperforming compared to irl with in-game 540mm and irl 710mm.
You. What.?
540 isnt even disrespectful at that point thats just sad
Well it is a 52 caliber
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/s/FCMmDTpaax
Removed bomb CCIP for the Su-7s
KAB-500Kr-E changed to Kr-M on the Su-24M2
i hope they get proximity fuse.
would make a fun low budget sahr missile out of it XD
already used the apkws on the A10C to shoot down 2 planes but the brimstones should pull “more Gs” wich makes them more usefull.
It has super high velocity due to being L/52. I imagine its like the British shells which the calculator give 40% less penetration than irl tests would show.
I am thinking i will suggest that naval gets shells with historical penetration, because naval shells are more expensive than tank rounds and of a much higher quality.