alright so from this tiny interaction I have gathered that you wont change your mind so im just gonna ignore you
why tf shouldn’t it get worse with distance?
the target gets smaller and smaller from the Sensor’s view in both cases
the distance equation that results in worse radar returns also applies for IR seekers
Thats the Gaijin way. Is the 30mm apds nerf coming this update too?
Who that lmao
Not Me!
1 Like
That´s good and all, but prepare to be completely ignored because Youtube video is not a PrImArY sOuRcE. Considering how popular Leopards are, they are just straight up asking for another classified document leak by some jaded Bundeswehr tanker.
1 Like
02ded, the one complaining KH38MT’s lock range is too short
why are some vehicles in latin letters and some not?
Just because it’s a Chinese client maybe? The CN translation differs a lot between vehicles
Epic lmao Let me use player search for a min
1 Like
wack I remember seeing a polish client and in it the FGR2 for the UK was the F4M which isnt wrong but its just a neat little change
Ok, thanks.
Since Chinese are from a completely different language family… that makes sense maybe
We tend to use the codename translated (the Chinese character refers to Phantom) for Nato armament. And keep the original name or transliteration for USSR
Plus: not always true, in game the US F4 still has it’s original name in Chinese Client, don’t really follow a particular pattern
sorry but just out of curiosity I havent seen an RWR like this
anyone know what the second ring is?
nvm Im stupid its the MAWS
1 Like
Will you guys also remove the FCS from the turret thats for ESPIRE too? As RARDEN was kind of well, unique, in not using what others would call “a fire control system” xD
Or do we actually have to bug report the RARDEN not having its own FCS like that, relying on being paired to a gunner sight which is effectively as they say “it”?
image for reference to what I mean
That plus the engine being a diesel engine (while named jaguar) makes me think there was a mixup on “which scimitar” it was supposed to be, so I assume the FCS is there in error.
3 Likes
Good Morning @Smin1080p_WT, I hope you’re keeping well.
I just wanted to re-ask you a question you were kind enough to answer for me last December, just to see if you were aware of any updates since then.
Essentially, In a Q&A after ‘Kings Of Battle’, We were told that Saraph receiving Spikes was under consideration. Is the answer still the same now? Cheers
1 Like
also gotta say the new airfields look amazing, there is an issue on desert maps like Suez where they have grass lol
@Smin1080p_WT Currently PLZ05 has reload time of 7.5s in the dev server, which is slower than both what the dev stream showed and conflict with what the issue admin replied in the following issue:
[DEV] PLZ-05 reload speed error // Gaijin.net // Issues
Could I ask what’s Gaijin plan for PLZ05 reload time? Will it be 7.5 or 6 seconds? Do we need to raise a new issue report?
1 Like