India isn’t a sub tree of Britain. Gaijin not knowing the difference between a subordination of a tree and a nation doesn’t make India have a sub tree.
As for Argentina, it has been directly and explicitly stated that Argentina is not a sub nation of Germany.
I remember Gaijin saying the other way
It is a sub nation.
Basically, they shouldn’t detonate upon impact; and even less so as easily as they currently do (all it takes is a single hit)… and even less so with such catastrophic results (one-hit death or, best case scenario, your entire ammo storage is depleted after causing significant crew, module and buoyancy damages).
For the record- do not confuse shell rooms with magazines! Magazines are fine as of now. It’s the shell rooms that are mismodelled.
I have hard time seeing the difference ingame.
A sub tree is a subordination of tree (a line). A sub nation is a subordination of a nation (a dependent nation).
Cool if they work on that, French ammorack are probably the worst: big, not protected and all…
Would be a big plus if a hit inside don’t mean kaboom :p
Sub-Tree, think South Africa, with a full line in the ground and vehicles scattered about.
Sub-Nation, think india, with only a small selection vehicles, all premiums, events and SQVs. None on the TT
Ok but that’s a really ‘small’ differences.
If Gaijin incorpored the vehicles from SA but put them whatever where they want, it’s not a subTT but a subNation but don’t change anything except location of the vehicles.
It is and it isnt.
Let me put it this way. If India was a Sub-TT. I would expect we would eventually get the Rafale. As a Sub-Nation, we shouldnt and hopefully also wont get any of the really bad soviet C&Ps on our actual TT. Instead just a select few premiums here or there
But even if that’s the case, a subTT or subNation don’t mean ALL vehicles from them gonna come in the game, Smin already said something like that.
Last I recall, Gaijin has things to the opposite effect.
And yet India isn’t despite Gaijin saying things to the contrary? Regardless, an Argentinian F-16 for Germany would make far more sense then a fictional German F-15.
Semantics
Smin said, a couple of weeks ago, that they were finally looking into it… so I am looking forward to it!
I never said that India isn’t a sub nation. Please don’t ignore key details
Differentiating between “nation” and “tree”, two entirely different words with not even remotely similar meanings, is not semantics. A sub nation and a sub tree are wholly different things.
surely france gets something in its air tree right? maybe even in the belgium line
The Mirage 2000D RMV.
There was a guy who made his own and even got hired by gaijin so theres that for you
It’s more that the reliable leak list has it.
You say that, and I don’t recall ever hearing anyone call India, or any country for that matter, a sub nation. All discourse I’ve had regarding the tree or nation or jamboree, or what have you has referred to it as a subtree.
And this all means Germany can’t get an Argentinian into their tech tree why exactly? Germany already has a ton of Argentinian vehicles in their tech tree as it is, them getting one of their F-16s to fill a gap isn’t out of left field.
This:
There isn’t enough room, and, again, Gaijin has directly and explicitly said that Argentina isn’t a sub nation of Germany. This isn’t up for debate.
TAMs - based on a German chassis, and the first variant was codeveloped with Germany.
SK-105A2 - originally planned to only be added to Germany.
They are not indicative of any Argentina sub nation.