how about the istalian f16 adf? could it carry aim 120?
F-16 ADFs can carry AIM-120s, however we don’t know which planes are going to get BVRAAMs ingame. BVRAAMs aren’t coming in this update anyways.
Until the 7th
F-16A Blk10 ADF in the AMI has amraams available on their arrival.
its most likely gonna be the planes in the test so the F16c
1 Like
I believe it’s because Challenger 2 has remodeled and the active missile
Hoping there is another one around Thursday or Friday
oh yeah speaking of which how is the challenger 2 remodel looking?
this says until march 7th
5 Likes
OK thanks 🙏
I wonder USAF F-16A Block 1 limited rear-aspect IR AAM only likely F-16A Block 1 from 4 initial European customers (Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands and Norway) ?
Mirage 2000C S1 ~ S5 never access MICA EM BVRAAM
Mirage 2000-5F, Mirage 2000-5 Mk.2, Mirage 2000-5EI, Mirage 2000i, Mirage 2000-9 and Mirage 2000-5EDA deploy MICA EM
2 Likes
Gaijin moment
But yours is probably correct since the post was edited today where the one I linked to hasn’t been edited since March 1st
Perhaps @Stona_WT could clarify
2 Likes
Gaijin is still working on it, but much better than old CR2
ok then nerf also f-16 all variants of them especially f-16 crazy op with how broken all of the flight models on all of them are put f-5 at higher brs one of the strongest and most overperforming premium aircraft in game nerf also f-16c as cas it can literally outrange pantsir with gbu remove the fake auto ricochet from top abrams plate its literally 38-51mm thick and modern apfsds should go through it like butter no the angle of the plate literally does nothing to stop the shell put the f-15 aswell on 12.7 literally no reason to keep it at 12.3 etc etc etc
The F-16 is a dominant aircraft, even in real life, and there’s extensive information regarding it as it is the most sold airframe platform; so details are out there. The F-15 sits good where it is at, it’s okay at being a jouster with it’s missiles but dog shit from mid to long range because it lacks the radar that it should’ve gotten, if anything, you should complain about the F-14A/B since it got AIM-54s with fire-and-forget at 11.7
The F-5c I partially agree with, but at the same time it’s only good because it is an excellent energy fighter that runs and guns, the missiles are ass though.
but my main complaint is that the US Ground is horrible to play. With one-tank-wonders for teammates, and the fact that every American vehicle at top tier is essentially a papier-mâché vehicle that just doesn’t survive. Literally it has more armor than the Leopards but the Leopards deflect almost every thing fired at it unless you get real lucky or you manage to get the ammo rack. The US also has a lot of Gen 2 thermals but in real life they got Gen-3s.
The Abrams also has a very strong front plate on the turret and also front hull in real life, that’s why you never see them often firing from their sides, and if they are, either they’re desperate or they got cover.
US surely suffers
no the upper front plate is around 51mm thick and many of sources i saw state that + modern apfsds should go straight through it but right now it just auto ricochet it
2 Likes
Perhaps this survey is, at least for now, the best sample of what the community in general thinks about c&p.
It’s an estimate of course… but I think in general most players agree with the c&p.
8 Likes
Hungarian air subtree be like