Yea, I mean the Thailand sub trees just passed so it’s now on their radar. The (T) F-16 could act as a test bed for future Thailand stuff : D
will italy actually get a top tier fighter that is on par with at least the F-16C and SMT, or does the fact they got copy paste tanks this year negate the fact they need a good fighter because gaijin logic, even giving the ADF better aim-9s would be better than nothing
Obligatory France Suffers™️
(Where Vextra and Jaguar?)
@Pacifica I will do some research and do a daft tonight to send to you via DM so you can help me make it better.
: D
In Q1 2024, I expect gaijin add Gripen C Early with PS-05/A Mk.3 radar, IR AAM with IRCCM placefolder, Rafale Litening III targeting pod, GBU-12/GBU-16 Paveway II, GBU-24 Paveway III and GBU-39 SDB
But unsure Gripen C equipped GBU-31/GBU-32/GBU-38 JDAM ?
We could…bur Sweden isnt USA, that is the problem.
Ok sure! I havent made a suggestion for like 6-7 years tho :P
last one I made was for ground deformation and that ended up in game :P
hehe
C&P JAS39C while Sweden gets only A ))
Umm, I’m not surpriced and unfinnished in dev server
Actually PS-37A radar it’s wrong, I hope gaijin change to PS-05/A radar in 2nd dev server
in another thread someone mentioned a C&P F-16 MLU via Romania, legit 9Ls are a joke at top tier along with the 7Ms
And I would prefer it to be changed to brochure paper plane with additional pylons.
Finally a IFV
Another one of the list
I wonder when the dev server will get updated. It’s supposed to close on monday after all. Although we might be getting a second one next week then.
Honestly, it doesn’t even matter at this point, it has the most mediocre radar missile at top tier
Better radar means when the one with AMRAAMS come it will be good
Radars are useful especially if you’re gonna use this for cas in grb
[Development] M1A2 SEP V2 TUSK II: American Cataphract - News - War Thunder, this is our only chance to let gaijin know how dissatisfy we are with the M1A2 SEP V2
Gib Scimitar, Scorpion & Abbot to UK tree, plez
I seriously doubt they’ll replace the A with a C variant like they said they would. We’ll just get another variant next update, or the one after.
Problem is… WT does not have game play mechanics for landing gear door pylons… otherwise they would have considered that possibility to begin with