Yeah… Britain needs a good IFV at 10.0 and 10.7. Stormer to be fixed and probably a better “Assault” SPAA like the Warrior VERDI-2 not a 6th MBT with all the same bugs and issues of the last 5.
Id have no issue with Tornado Gr1 finally being finished. would be a fun jet. But the Tornado Gr1 we have now could have been added end of 2021. So it was a year late to begin with and being a year+ to complete and then getting nothing else. I’d be done with the game for a while. I’ve alreayd not touched it in 2 months, I dont see the point currently. Base bombing in the Tornado Gr1 whislt hiding from Mig-29SMTs in SB is just not fun anymore. Especially after doing it for a year
That’s a lie.
It was introduced as the most powerful IFV in the game, fixed, then its BR was fixed. It’s now just a powerful 9.0, not OP, and not bad.
The most nerfed vehicle goes to PUMA going from 8.3 to 10.0.
Except those aren’t nerfs, those were historical corrections based on reports players made with evidence.
It was OP, and was a 9.7 at 8.3. Now it’s a 9.0 at 9.0.
5 tanks with 4 second autoloaders are nice but there’s just no CAS and the Apache is relatively uninteresting.
France has ITO-90 and 4 leclercs and the Spike tiger is nice, but those lineups just aren’t so good as the US, German, Swedish and Soviet 11.7-12.3 ground lineups.
BRs are the nerfing/buffing system for the most part.
Sometimes reloads are involved but that’s rare.
Ammunition however is involved more times than not.
Also dang, the Dardo is 10.0 due to its missiles.
But yeah, Type 89 is BMP-3 equivalent and its BR being the same is purely a coincidence.
Ignore that every 8.7 IFV in the game is inferior to the Type 89 & BMP-3 I guess. @XSpaz1NOuTX
Reloads are always involved. Most NATO tanks could have a reload time as low as 3 seconds. Multiple sources have been provided for this and iirc, the response has always been that reloads are a balancing decision not a modeling decision.
“a lens or other optical component in an optical instrument” if i use it to see, then its part of the optics, if you were specifically talking about zoom, then just say so