Nooo D:
To be fair I prefer Leclerc over abrams due to armor, reload and mobility as US main.
They will just copy what they give sweden and call it a day as they are the same plane
4 Likes
The Barak II also got AIM-7M that people are saying it could, but never did use.
Wouldn’t be too far fetched for Gaijin to give the SAAF 39C skyflashes.
2 Likes
its not that the SAAF ones have A-Darter which is like python 4 which is too advance
So they just copy the Swedish one
1 Like
watche them give you a Gripen with Skyflash (Dogfight)
that one iirc only had 9L and then IRIS-T
with no 9M or Li inbetween
Doesn’t have a CW illuminator unlike the f16s that did i think
F-16C is not supposed to have a CW illuminator as far as everyone is concerned.
I bet they just give it 9ms for balance as it could technically use them
1 Like
Iirc python 4 was found in the CDK, so you never know. However I think just copying th swedish loadouts is far more likely.
but, there is in theory a ready made set of modifications to add a CW illuminator in case the thing will be sold to states that shouldn’t get F3s
To be disappointed so early on is no-one’s fault but that of the one disappointed themselves.
Disappointed is better served in retrospect rather than so early.
1 Like
Disappointed is best not to be served at all
2 Likes
Interesting maybe they will give it skyflashes hopefully super temp
1 Like
na, hopefully AMRAAM
Hopefully
And now we try and find who asked (impossible task)
1 Like
Skyflash at 12+ :C
Jesus I hope not hahaha
i got to have AMRAAMS or it might as well be IR only
I’m not even being rude, i’m just being honest. Naval is very much on the backburner and has been left to rot