The T-90M doesn’t have the mobility to be a real 2A7V equivalent and the SEPv2 lacks the hull armor while having no other advantages to be an equivalent. 520-550mm vs KE is still a lolpen for the 2A7V.
I didn’t list the Challenger 2 because it’s still a challenger, no matter how cool the LEP looks :(
Ah so the classical "balance isn’t a problem any.ore because it doesn’t affect me anymore. Should have expected that after we had the exact same discussion about the Strv 122 3 years ago.
Bro, I play 8 nations at top tier. Each and any single change in balance to any nation affects me.
And I just want balance to benefit everyone as much as possible.
And yes: I think that the more nations with T-80BVM/Strv 122 counterparts there are, the better.
You seem to believe that “if not everyone can get it at the same time, then nobody should”. What kind of philosophy is that?
So it’s not bad for 122s and BVMs to fight 2A6s and SEPs… but 122s and BVMs fighting 2A7Vs and SEPv2s is bad because SEPv2 isn’t 1:1 to the others even though it’s not just a significant improvement over SEP, but also better than any other German and Russian tank besides BVM and 2A7V?
Lmao dude the SEPv2 isn’t a significant improvement in game over the SEP from what we suspect. It has a 100-150mm more armor vs KE on the hull. Still lolpen for every 11.3-12.3 tank.
I still don’t believe there will be a 2A7V this patch by the way since that skips too many vehicles imo.
It’s gonna be either a base 2A7, TVM MAX or DEMO II.