Introduced same year. Know your shit before you start looking at me crazy.
Historical matchmaking would ruin game balance. Theres no balancing some matchups because at times, enemies completely outclass each other.
2 Likes
Well i dont like having to fight cold war tanks in my M26. I mean maybe i would not work far aircraft but top tier aircraft already have different BR’s for Air and Ground battles.
M26 is an early cold war tank. Sure, it might suck, but the M26 is overtiered as is. The M41 vs T-55 also wouldnt be a fun battle, and neither would any panzer 3 or 4 against a jumbo. You read all my examples, dont brush it off as just an aircraft problem.
1 Like
They CAN, but the wire is likely to break. Even then, you can still fire them as you’re coming to a stop.
1 Like
Ergo…
…you can fire them on the move.
1 Like
No. For the reasons you list.
Nothing of what I said meant you couldn’t fire them on the move. You can, but you also need to stop right away to keep the guiding wire intact.
Unlike in-game where you have to be completely stationary to do so.
Fire a TOW in game. Now jerk the mouse or WASD keys down like the room you are in just came to a sudden stop.
Now read the FM page kimpromo2 kindly provided.
Irrelevant, Bradley sight is stabilized.
The human body isn’t.
There are reasons why things are written the way they are in manuals and sekrut dokumunts, and no ammount of video game wishful thinking and handwaving changes that.
Unless Gaijin wants to for “game balance”…
Yet we can still shoot while driving full speed in MBTs and even the Bradley itself, curious!
You really seem to think “Shouldn’t” means you “can’t”
2 Likes
Because when you pull the trigger the round is flying on its own trajectory wherever the gun was pointing. But when you are guiding a missile, you have to keep the sights on target for the entire flight and that means the gunner can’t induce any inadvertent control movements, like from having his head smashed into the sight by the tracks making the vehicle stop.
Com’on man, think more.
No that is what you think. The Army doesn’t do “shouldn’t”.
“seem” was included in that sentence for a reason.
@Conte_Baracca even says that even though he did not allow his tanks to lap load, they STILL did it. It doesn’t matter what people are told not to do. They still sneak and do things they arent supposed to, because it won’t matter as long as they don’t get caught. I highly doubt that if your life is on the line, and you could EXPLODE or burn alive in your metal box at any moment, the last thing on your mind is gonna be “Oh but First Sarnt said dont do that” Lets be realistic.
2 Likes
There is a video they show every tanker and tank mechanic in training that shows what happens when the cardboard case of a 120mm round breaks open and catches fire inside a tank.
I find it hard to believe any one would be stupid enough to lap load 120mm, not just for the hazard of it, but also that any NCO or officer would risk their careers cheating during gunnery or in combat when the risks of the loader screwing up is far greater than the couple of seconds saved on a reload in combat. In a combat where it didn’t matter that much because the M1 vastly overmatched its oppsition.
So most likely your “friend” was either BSing you, or if they were an old timer, misremembering back to when the Marines still had M60s.
Could you explain the difference in effectiveness between the M3A3 and the 2S38 in your card?
Okay.
Combat veteran literally telling you that it’s very likely it happened. I’m not sure what else you want, a video that nobody would allow on the internet?
2 Likes