DM73 is DM53 with more powder, quite literally that’s it.
And 3BM60 is worse than even M829A1, which is on M1A1.
DM53 doesn’t have anti-ERA capabilities, you’re thinking of a potential DM83.
L27A1 also doesn’t have anti-ERA capabilities and is on par with 3BM60.
So no, there is nothing unfair here other than 3BM59 isn’t in the game yet.
Tandem dynamic protection “Doublet” (btvt.info)
and bonus
unless you find something better that show me to prove DM53 don’t have anti ERA i’m all ears
not trust me bro/.com
interesting that’s why dm53 was made to defeat heavy era…^^
also some proof that your clam is true and not straight out of the place where the sun doesn’t shine ?
there more then enough reports made for rounds such as dm53 or L27 missing it’s anti era capability’s
the hull does not have DU
balans
DM53 doesn’t have anti-ERA capabilities, you’re thinking DM83.
Correct, it doesn’t in the game, BUT it does have them in real life. Same with L27. DM53 was made to defeat Heavy ERA and Rheinmetall straight up says it does do that, so I’ll be trusting them.
Both are them are, truth be told, in a nerfed state right now.
You’ll notice all the ERA for that tank is in-tact, meaning the round didn’t hit ERA.
Which is possible to accomplish in WT.
@MuricaxSuffers @FurinaBestArchon
Being made to “defeat” can just mean high-pen, that’s it. Not have anti-ERA features of DM83 or M829A3+.
And DM53 can defeat tanks with ERA, just not all of them.
I really do hope that they are paying you properly. Always love to read your stuff here for fun.
The US federal government, & Washington state government are paying me well enough.
Which M1A2 turret armor is accurate?
Both.
M1A2 SEP only upgraded some hulls armor according to the data we’ve seen so far.
SEP V2 upgraded turret armor.
bro, we’ve already proven the m1a2 has depleted uranium in its hull. this was talked about to death on reddit and people even made bug reports from U.S Government sources proving this., You need to get up to speed
Everything you said in this post does not disprove anything I said.
anybody who says the M1 series has a UFP that can withstand anything are coping. It hasn’t ricocheted rounds in a long time.
Still Abrams in this game are kind weak LFP should be around 500-550mm in the game (maybe more maybe less since I don’t know how this game make the armor)
Oh trust me i have sources saying DM53, DM 63, M829A2 could all penetrate KONTACT 5 and a French rounds from 2003 could fully penetrate Kontact 5, i’ve had enough of these Fairy tale russian tanks with K5 being invulnerable to rounds they shouldnt be.
Tandem dynamic protection “Doublet” (btvt.info)
Analysis of the design of BPS countries NATO confirms the implementation of measures to overcome remote sensing without initiating explosives. The outdated DZ “Contact-5” is likely to be overcome by the BPS M829A2, OFL-F1 and DM43 without explosive initiation thanks to the pointed design of their head part without initiating the detonation of explosives in protective elements. Even in the case of initiation of explosives in elements 4S22 and 4S23 due to the segmented design of the bow core (BPS DM53, M829A3) high Armor penetration ability will be maintained.
BPS of the latest generation DM53, DM63, M829A3 along with the design The head part (optimized to overcome the remote sensing) has a special segmented core design, little affected by DZ “Contact-5” and “Relic” [2, 3]. The Research Institute of Steel was testing the built-in DZ “Contact-5” in mainly with the help of the BPS 3BM22, which by design has little in common with the BPS foreign countries.
Developers of foreign BPS DZ “Kontakt-5” is widely used when testing solutions for overcoming DZ. At tests of the DM53 BPS used mock-ups of protection units similar to those used in designs of T-90S and T-80U tanks, including DZ “Contact-5”, “Relic” and a promising multilayer DZ. Due to the shortcomings of the devices DZ, built according to the “classical” plano-directional scheme, foreign The developers of anti-tank weapons managed to overcome the armor Russian-made BPS tanks of 120 mm caliber from distances over 3 km.
c9336047d307.thumb.jpg.94a90903658f174bcc900724f421371c.jpg (1000×626) (gaijin.net)
That’s why in WT, DM53 & M829A2 do indeed penetrate tanks fitted with Kontakt 5.
They’re not lol pen K-5 in the game and not work as it supposed to at this point, I think you don’t understand how Anti Era ability even work it not just high enough pen it more than that.
even Relic can be pen at close range by DM53 but in the game, it works it all range which is many reports and source that they’re overperforming (in many bugs report you can go find it)
but well, the source is enough go read it. because I’m tired of your unproved fact that I don’t know where you pull those from
From the game itself.
you can go onto T–90A, T-72B3, and T-80U & see for yourself with protection analysis.
