I don’t have a headcanon for you. You’re simply not trustworthy.
Fact.
He means the playerbase that mains USSR and has been balanced to their tastes.
No notes, I agree with what you summarize here, Daniel.
3 Likes
He means the playerbase that mains USSR and has been balanced to their tastes.
They never made any mention of playerbase in the interview, nor were any statistics provided so you cannot make these unfounded claims.
I don’t have a headcanon for you. You’re simply not trustworthy.
But you’re inventing reasons for my profile being private and it having anything to do with “trustworthiness”.
Regardless, irrelevant.
1 Like
Relevant enough to me to disprove you and discount your opinions from hereon.
Relevant enough to me to disprove you and discount your opinions from hereon.
I already said that you’re fabricating headcanon to handwave what you disagree with but thank you for verifying.
It must be really easy to be right when you just ignore and handwave anyone asking you to prove your claims.
1 Like
Fixing the turret ring so that the visibly 300mm thick plate isn’t 50mm thick ingame is not “artificially inflating it”.
And it’s not “buffing”; it’s CORRECTING.
The same way we want 2A7’s hull to go from 670mm KE to 750mm KE, which is WAY less needed but we still support it because it doesn’t make sense that it’s less protected than Strv 122. But for some odd reason there’s no problem with that “buff”.
9 Likes
No it’s really easy for you to continually derail the thread, in which case we can say you’re not worth our further time.
Well said, Spanish
2 Likes
The only fabricated headcanon here is the one the spammers construct to try to delegitimise people’s perfect valid concerns here via strawman fallacies.
-Hey, this wrong turret ring should be corrected.
+MUH AMERICAN NOOB WANTS INVINCIBLE ABRAMS MUH HISTORY CHANNEL
-I just want corrections on-
+SKILL ISSUE ARIETE HAS IT WORSE CRYBABY US MAIN
Believe me, it is becoming exhausting that EACH and EVERY single Abrams-related thread is assaulted like this because some people’s feelings are hurt too deeply by the idea that people also want foxes for the Abrams, the same way we ant them for each and every single other tank in the game.
13 Likes
That’s great and all and I’m glad you took the time to write this fanfic but if you spent as much time providing credible evidence instead then there would be no need for this fanfic.
Also you’re literally strawmanning in the post where you complain about strawmanning.
1 Like
Yeah about that…
They also think that Tunguska 2S6 was significantly inferior to others SPAA and has worst statistics. According to their “Data”.
So they went ahead and add Pantsir-S1.
If anythings we learn that Gaijin “Data” . Isn’t the best source to use when it come to balance.
1 Like
There is plenity of evidence among the 1,000+ replies on this thread, as well as the many other multiple-thousand post threads that had to be purged and locked because of the haters that brigade them every single time, many of which were gladfully perma-banned because of how far they were taking their hatred into these threads.
1 Like
There is not “plenty of evidence”. There is lots of baseless conjecture, unrelated documents that are cited that don’t support claims being made, sources that are beyond questionable and more.
That does not fit the bill, and it is why your bug reports continue to get rejected. Provide the proof or stop barking.
1 Like
Asking you to substantiate your claims with evidence is derailing the thread? Interesting, I guess you just want people to nod silently and agree with you without asking for evidence that way they aren’t derailing.
I’ve done nothing but continually ask for evidence in the latter half of this thread and been met with nothing but hostility and toxicity from the usual suspects such as yourself whilst providing nothing.
And you wonder why the US main subsect has such a poor reputation.
1 Like
I meant evidence as of what happens on all of these threads every time, because:
This is not what happens.
So? If people want to start posting unrelated verbal abuse that has nothing to do with the topic then you flag them or report it and move on. Whenever you engage with it you’re just giving them what they want, and when you keep bringing it up constantly you’re just reinforcing the behaviour if they see it.
Those people get dealt with as and when. It’s not like this is unique to abrams threads either regardless, a lot of threads devolve into a muck flinging contest.
1 Like
This is not what happens.
But it is? I’ve been asking for the entire latter half of this thread for evidence to substantiate various claims made by US mains making various statements and all I’ve received in return is verbal abuse and no answers or evidence.
Frankly I’ve been beyond patient.
2 Likes
Evidence about what, specifically?
Let’s just clear and solve whatever it is quickly now xd.
Just wanted to remind that my first entry to this thread was this ^
Too many things to remember, it’s all written there so if you’re so inclined you can check and provide for the various people I’ve responded to asking.
1 Like
Don’t know what you on about.
but the report has already been made. And and already has link post in this topic.
7 Likes
I’m still cracking up at how long it is taking Gaijin to fix the CE protection of the turret side when we’ve primary evidence that even gives an “actual numbers” (well, it still has to be calculated, but it’s very easy to do since you just take the current value and multiply it by 2.5x).
A seemingly easy fix but it has been close to 2 years now since SEP was added.
4 Likes