Yeah about that…
They also think that Tunguska 2S6 was significantly inferior to others SPAA and has worst statistics. According to their “Data”.
So they went ahead and add Pantsir-S1.
If anythings we learn that Gaijin “Data” . Isn’t the best source to use when it come to balance.
There is plenity of evidence among the 1,000+ replies on this thread, as well as the many other multiple-thousand post threads that had to be purged and locked because of the haters that brigade them every single time, many of which were gladfully perma-banned because of how far they were taking their hatred into these threads.
There is not “plenty of evidence”. There is lots of baseless conjecture, unrelated documents that are cited that don’t support claims being made, sources that are beyond questionable and more.
That does not fit the bill, and it is why your bug reports continue to get rejected. Provide the proof or stop barking.
Asking you to substantiate your claims with evidence is derailing the thread? Interesting, I guess you just want people to nod silently and agree with you without asking for evidence that way they aren’t derailing.
I’ve done nothing but continually ask for evidence in the latter half of this thread and been met with nothing but hostility and toxicity from the usual suspects such as yourself whilst providing nothing.
And you wonder why the US main subsect has such a poor reputation.
I meant evidence as of what happens on all of these threads every time, because:
This is not what happens.
So? If people want to start posting unrelated verbal abuse that has nothing to do with the topic then you flag them or report it and move on. Whenever you engage with it you’re just giving them what they want, and when you keep bringing it up constantly you’re just reinforcing the behaviour if they see it.
Those people get dealt with as and when. It’s not like this is unique to abrams threads either regardless, a lot of threads devolve into a muck flinging contest.
This is not what happens.
But it is? I’ve been asking for the entire latter half of this thread for evidence to substantiate various claims made by US mains making various statements and all I’ve received in return is verbal abuse and no answers or evidence.
Frankly I’ve been beyond patient.
Evidence about what, specifically?
Let’s just clear and solve whatever it is quickly now xd.
Just wanted to remind that my first entry to this thread was this ^
Too many things to remember, it’s all written there so if you’re so inclined you can check and provide for the various people I’ve responded to asking.
Don’t know what you on about.
but the report has already been made. And and already has link post in this topic.
I’m still cracking up at how long it is taking Gaijin to fix the CE protection of the turret side when we’ve primary evidence that even gives an “actual numbers” (well, it still has to be calculated, but it’s very easy to do since you just take the current value and multiply it by 2.5x).
A seemingly easy fix but it has been close to 2 years now since SEP was added.
Literally, the guy showed a Bradley pinging a M1 turret ring and not penning, then did so with an M1A2, and you said, “I don’t do Reddit, do this instead to accommodate my patience.”
You’re being disingenuous, there was no wild claims you saw here enough for you to forget. Go back and find the claims that YOU are asking for proof for.
Yes I did indeed say that I didn’t do reddit. I did indeed say that you can pen an M1 turret ring with a panzer 4 shell which is something I have seen people bring up multiple times for why the M1A2 turret ring is bad.
No, the people being disingenuous are you and the others making claims and then when you’re asking to substantiate them, you don’t. It is not my job to prove your case for you.
If you want to make the claim, you prove it.
Find the claims YOU want evidence for, and if I agree with them, I’ll bring the evidence. Go ahead.
Do you somehow disagree?
That isn’t how it works sunshine. The original posts where I asked for evidence are all still there. Just because you didn’t provide evidence for them when I asked doesn’t mean I’m going to waste my time going through it all to repost it all again for you to ignore it a second time.
You make a claim, you prove it. Nothing stopping you replying to any of my previous posts asking for evidence with it if you have suddenly found it.
I suspect not though.
I don’t know what claims you don’t have proof of, and you arent owed anything for us to comb through the entire thread just for you. Until you actually make a point and bring me the claims you want evidence of, why are you even here?