Because there’s nothing of substance for me to add? Swedish S-122s are effectively an enigma, and info on the composites used is so hard to gain that not even the visual model is confirmed to be correct.
Invisible spall liners? What kind of special are you?
He said the successor to the M1A2 SEPv4, and I’d assume that means the M1E3. Any newsletter I find that mentions Safran optics links them to the booker and M1E3.
Don’t you know? The 3-day long rants in the Leopard 2A7 thread spent slandering Gaijin for nonexistent issues are perfectly fine, but a general think-tank styled suggestion thread is oh-so horrible.
I personally think it’s a useless addition, with the only good thing coming from it being the armor protection… Even then, I’d rather have the previous models refined and finalized before anything protection-wise is added.
The SEPv3 hasn’t been used for 4 decades, though. All of its additions are centered around logistical combat and anti-personnel / ambient protection, and wouldn’t serve for tank/tank combat.
The only addition is armor. That’s pretty much it.