M1a2 sep v3

Because there’s nothing of substance for me to add? Swedish S-122s are effectively an enigma, and info on the composites used is so hard to gain that not even the visual model is confirmed to be correct.

Invisible spall liners? What kind of special are you?

1 Like

plenty of sources gaijoob doesn’t wan’t to see that’s literally gonna counter their “sources” on the abrams capabilities.

Again, not a single thing was stated about the SEPv3’s hull.

ignorance lmao when the last time u played top tier?

Posted today and already close to 100 comments, so fancy

1 Like

He said the successor to the M1A2 SEPv4, and I’d assume that means the M1E3. Any newsletter I find that mentions Safran optics links them to the booker and M1E3.

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/553364572933980170/1209942941980950528/FtCa0Y9aEAQnDei.png?ex=65e8c22d&is=65d64d2d&hm=c37b82d0ead50c5d05a6f0806a8815070ef57f9dc2f7fdc4dd1469debba66a7c&=&format=webp&quality=lossless&width=605&height=288

You’re subtracking ARAT from the base vehicle weight.

1 Like

I was under the impression TUSK-II was 1.5 tonnes, not 1.65

Can we please keep the topic on M1A2 Sep v3…

5 Likes

bro this comment section is declared a idea zone by me, why did my suggestion get denied.

2 Likes

you dont decide that

1 Like

then who does

yall really too down like 30 comments dam

1 Like

Don’t you know? The 3-day long rants in the Leopard 2A7 thread spent slandering Gaijin for nonexistent issues are perfectly fine, but a general think-tank styled suggestion thread is oh-so horrible.

Oh, no, 1/4 the views so impactful.

1 Like

im just worried some els is going to come algo and restart the thread saying how useless the sepv3 would be.

1 Like

I personally think it’s a useless addition, with the only good thing coming from it being the armor protection… Even then, I’d rather have the previous models refined and finalized before anything protection-wise is added.

if the USA still uses it and has been for 4 decades it couldn’t be that usless.

The SEPv3 hasn’t been used for 4 decades, though. All of its additions are centered around logistical combat and anti-personnel / ambient protection, and wouldn’t serve for tank/tank combat.

The only addition is armor. That’s pretty much it.

i meant the tank design has been upgraded for 4 decades

1 Like

Well what I was saying is that the implementation of the SEPv3 would be useless. That’s what topic I primarily meant to reference.