winrate mean nothing, italy have a better winrate than US while being 10x time worst, the issue is the state of US main team not the tank.
No. After the weakening of the USSR, Germany and other NATO countries grew, but the United States did not. The other problem is
italy have a 63.78 winrate, they got no new mbt, meta or anything but still have a good winrate, any explaination ?
with also their top tier tank that can be penned by DM63 from anywhere and being heavy
There are no complete statistics. Nobody plays the Italians
I do, and i have a 63% win rate and a 66% average position in the team. The difference being that lot of italy player know how to actually be good and haven’t buy a 60$ pack to play 11.3 in their newly added premium HC
The stats mean nothing ok they can’t be used to prove anything only to infer
USA has the biggest shitter players. I don’t know how they are oblivious to that fact. Kroks are next in line at being the worst. Both of those type of players seem to have no clue what a capture zone is
Then how do I fix the US win rate? If even 5 seconds don’t help
you can’t they ain’t broken
why would you fix it ? the problem isn’t the tank, the problem is that before top tier wasn’t full of premium top tier that leave after one death, now it is. that’s why your winrate suck at this point, not bcs the tank is bad but bcs people playing it are bad. when playing with abrams player i can be sure that my team will be empty in no time. Not because they died 3-4 time but bcs they died in their HC with 0 point and have no point to spawn in their backup F4S. at least now i know how to buff ariete, lets sink down italy win rate boiz so gaijin finally fix the superheavy air tank!
And it is at this time that the developers introduce a Click Beat to finally finish off)
You can’t fix something that doesn’t want to fix itself.
I just see lots of people in different teams wanting their team to be given the best.
Those who don’t play the M1 are crying and those who do are loving the reload time. Same old pointless story. “I don’t play it so nerf it to death.”
if you want I can play m1, i have like a 1.8 kd on the ariete pso so playing a faster tank with a better reload and armor would be funnier than playing a glorify cardboard box with a 120 on top. the only reason i ain’t playing russia, swe, germany or usa is that I actually enjoy challenge so yeah big 3 not for me.
We want realism equally for everyone, so 2a7 should also reload based on realism, between 3 to 5 seconds.
Of course, we cannot forget the correction of Leopard 2a7’s armor defects.
I play UK and what a pain but it is what it is. I don’t cry over it I just accept that in my chosen BR the UK had it hard.
All I see is each individual main crying over what they don’t have, and others do and I ask the player base overall what do you want? Realism or a fair game because you won’t get both.
Fair game that why ariete should have better armor lo , fair game mean that every one should be equal problem, ariete isn’t equals to anything, other problems, abrams is better in anyway compared to ariete, why would abrams be buff when ariete get a huge nerf (+ 5t on an already painfully underpowered tank)? What make abrams much more in need than the ariete or leclerc?