Sorry I stopped reading after the post saying Abrams are the best MBTs ingame
Forgive me
what did you expose again other than the fact that im better than you? cos that has been clear long before this debate ever happened lol
1 Like
I don’t think you are in much of a position to talk shit with stats like these:
3 Likes
Average Team position : 37%
Average Kills/Spawn : 0.60
41.83% : Average Player
I don’t call that being better than anyone, sorry Russia main 🤣
damn looks like i broke your brain so hard in the other thread you cant even read properly anymore
1 Like
LMAOOO it’s not even me 🤣
You’re trying to make me look bad, how sad are you 🤣
That was actually you. I just used your last months stats while you are using your overall stats to make yourself look better. (imagine getting worse over time, yikes)
Still very cute stats though, adorable even. I’ll give you that.
3 Likes
What, why would you take my last month perfs and consider those are my actual perfs ? Why not 2, 3, 15 months before that ?
The overall stats are the actual ones that you have to take, it shows the actual average.
You’re not the freshest trout in the stream.
Because overall stats also includes legacy stats from when someone started playing. Generally people get better over time, so using the last month’s statistics more accurately reflects their current skill level.
Now the more important question, how the hell did you get worse over time?
Ironic coming from someone like you who is barely mid at a pretty simple game like WT.
3 Likes
Now the more important question, how the hell did you get worse over time?
Because I entered the 12.7 as France main against Russia, and get decimated every game, because NATO is dogwater at top tier against Russia.
Thank you for proving my point from the previous thread.
Congrats, you just proved my point. despite going into the T 80 U with literally 0 toptier experience, I still managed a pretty respectable K/D. The M1A1 AIM on the other hand (and the Boxer MGS aswell) are both objectively bad vehicles, and my difference in performance reflects as such.
searches Russia
gets Russia
“omg there’s so much Russia”
Lmao
Yet all my Leclercs sit around a 54-63% WR and a 2.0 K/D and K/S. (Against the same top tier Russia that you face)
So again, sounds more like a you issue.
3 Likes
The M1A1 AIM is not an objectively bad vehicle lmao. It’s better than a bunch of 12.3 vehicles while it sits at 12.0.
4 Likes
It’s worse than most vehicles it faces, even in downtiers. There is not a single reason to take an Abrams over a Leo 2, T-80, or TKX/Type 10. They only way you could possibly make it look “good” is by comparing it to ever more abhorently terrible MBTs (namely Ariete, Chally, and Merk).
Spoiler
And now someone with 10k hours on Merkava/Ariete/Chally alone is gonna come in here and try to tell me that it’s actually the best MBT in the game and everyone else is just wrong, just like yall are doing for the Abrams.
The Abrams is just way more versatile than the Type 10/TKX, has a higher skill ceiling/potential than any of the T-80s and are about on par or slightly better than the 2A5-2A6 Leos.
Your Abrams stats aren’t because the tank is bad, the Abrams is not hard to go positive in. You can’t use the “but muh tank” excuse this time.
4 Likes
If the Abrams was actually good, then its stats would reflect such. You can’t even use the but premium noobs excuse cause premium Leopards and premium T-80s both exist. The Abrams doesn’t have a higher skill ceiling than other tanks, it just requires more skill to do the same as other tanks.
Again, there’s no reason to use an Abrams over any thing else other than a Chally, Ariete, or Merk. Its armor as bad, and its survivability is terrible. Its firepower is maybe average at best. Its mobility is matched or exceeded by most other MBTs. It fails in all three sections of the iron triangle.
Most Abrams at 12.7 have similar stats to the not uparmored Leopard 2s and T-series except for the T-80BVM in december. The Type 10s have better stats due to minor nation players.
The M1A2T currently has the highest K/D and K/S of all 12.7 MBTs, so much for being a bad tank huh?
(EDIT: I missed the 2A7HU, so I guess it’s second best for K/D)
The M1A1 Clickbait also has better stays in december than the T-80UE-1.
So you were saying?
Lmao. It’s firepower is far better than average. It’s firepower is only beaten by the Type 10/TKX.
3 Likes
It does. Place 2 equally good players in a T-80 and Abrams, the Abrams player will curbstomp the T-80 player.
3 Likes
tbf, the Abrams does have a higher skill potential but does punish normal players more for their mistakes. Where things like t80’s have a low skill ceiling but are far more forgiving for mistakes.
Or in short, T80’s are great for the 15 minute matches we have with rb and Abrams are good for tournament/sim matches.
Add in things like the unrealistic turret basket, 50mm neck, tiny maps and a horrendously compressed br and it really does stack up against normal players.
2 Likes