If you dont like it play a different game, theres no other solution then either skill issue or different game
Bro imagine complaining about thermals and wanting the vehicle to be at 10.3 90% of the Russian vehicles don’t even get thermals at that BR So should we lower them as well?
Okay at the max crew tell me one thing that t80b does better than the Abrams well I’ll tell you right now nothing because the reload is slower mobility is relatively equal the gun traverse and the elevation is horrendous so please just stop coping
I’m just sitting here trying to figure if Harry here is using a alt profile cause I can’t find anything on this dude.
M1A1 AIM’s aren’t difficult to fight, but that’s because… well, there’s no way to sugarcoat this, but they’re typically played by players such as yourself.
The type of players that grind the AIM/purchase the Click-Bait way before they’re ready for top-tier gameplay, then proceed to not have a lineup, no idea how to play the various maps, poor aim, situational awareness, positioning, weakspot knowledge, etc. and then when they inevitably do poorly, they blame it on the M1 being supposedly bad.
It doesn’t matter how powerful/undertiered a given vehicle is, as long as it’s primarily used by poor players it’ll always be easy to fight them.
But hey, the more people with negative K/D’s and 25% winrates the higher the chance we see it downtiered to 11.7 as a result, despite all of it’s peers sitting at 12.3 - 12.7.
No offense, but implying I’m the one that’s playing the M1 poorly when our stats in these MBT’s are as follows is a bit daring:
B-but the M1A2 has a commander’s thermal! That changes everything!
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Nobody struggling to fight any tank you play m8.
Ah yes, stats that completely shatter Necron’s statement that you aren’t skilled at the AIM’s BR. With such modern vehicles as the KV-1, T-34-85, and T1E1. Noticeably, these are your stats with the paltry sum of vehicles you have unlocked at high-to-top tier.
A trend many will see is that these are all either squadron or event vehicles, barring the LAV-AD! Meaning you fall exactly into the type of player Necrons was describing; unprepared for the type of gameplay at which the AIM finds itself.
Furthermore, you seem to have trapped yourself with a bit of a logical oopsie, wherein you assume that if a vehicle is ‘one of the best’ you must be able to do well with it, when it has already been explained that a bad player will still fail to realize a vehicles potential, regardless of how good said vehicle is!
With, or without the huge broken turret ring and UFP weakspots ?
I have no idea what you’re trying to show me with that screenshot. Am I missing something?
In it’s current in game form, even with those weakspots it’s easily among the best 10.7 MBTs.
I’m getting the distinct feeling it’s another one of sartt’s alt accounts.
Gotta be a ragebait from a russian main
Ah yes I main Russia so much, Russia isn’t even in my top 3 most played nations at top tier lol.
I honestly wouldn’t be suprised. However this guy is a French main, which seems pretty uncharacteristic for sartt.
I exposed your bad performance, you’re dogwater, arcade ground player 🤣


Russia main or not, it makes no difference with you ngl





