Lower BR of pre-top NATO SPAA

  • Decrease B.r of listed SPAA
  • Don’t change anything
  • Other
0 voters

After playing quite a lot past weeks at 11.0-11.3 B.r for both USSR and USA side I’ve noticed a huge disadvantage for non USSR team in terms of available SPAA. I was mainly playing CAS so I want to share some of my experience of fighting AA’s of the both sides(USSR and non USSR).

In this topic I won’t suggest increasing USSR SPAA’s B.r as it’s still possible do to well against them if with enough effort, I would rather strongly suggest to lower B.r for many underperforming non USSR SPAA’s to close the big gap we have here between Roland’s/Stingers and some actually effective SPAA’s.
While playing Su-25T, Su-24M or Ka-50 main threat for you are mainly Roland’s and Stingers that are both limited a lot in range and capability to intercept munition fired at them.
At the same time on the USSR side you have 2S6, Osa’s and Strela, first two can easily deal with any munition you fire at them as they have 6-8 missiles ready to fire that are also much better than Roland ones.
NATO side SPAA even at 11.3 mostly consists of Lav-ad that have close to 0 ability to shot down missiles or Roland’s that have only 2 missiles that are nowhere enough to deal with Su-39 and their Kh-29T or any other attackers of this B.r, after all these two are 10.0 SPAA and really shouldn’t even be used at 11.0+.

Playing with USSR CAS i have no problem making 6-10 kills by a plane/heli per game, while on US side I’m lucky to get 3-4 tanks with F-4E or MH-60 as you have to waste a ton of time to kill something like 2S6 and they’re wont let you fly around close to them killing tanks like you can do with Roland’s or Stingers. AGM-65’s are too slow and easy to intercept for them, they are nowhere near as good as Kh-29T at dealing with your problems.

The problem with lack of any good SPAA’s at this B.r should be solved by decreasing B.r of all the underperforming SPAA’s, they don’t belong at such a high B.r , especially if we look at something like 2S6 that sits at 10.7

US/UK ADATS
11.7 → 11.3
There is no reason it sits a whole 1.0 B.r higher than 2S6. Su-25T can definitely deal with ADATS, it won’t be harder for it than for F-4E to deal with 2S6. It’s a much more worthy opponent for the CAS of this B.r than some Roland’s.

FlaRakRad
11.7 → 11.3
Its only advantage is somewhat good missiles but having only 2 of them ready and bad radar make it very difficult to defend yourself from something like Kh-29T - at least it shouldn’t allow the planes flying straight at you to dodge it with simple maneuver like it can be done with Roland or Stinger.

Type-81C
11.7 → 11.0
Has no way to defend itself, if plane spots you first - you’re dead, it’s just a better Strela, having no radar makes it really bad at this B.r against all the long range CAS that live here. After plane contrails where basically removed(moved to 9km+ Alt) spotting plane at distance can be a very difficult task.

ITO-90M
12.0 → 11.7
It makes no sense that it sits at the same BR as S1, it has a very weak radar, no guns, worse missiles.
It should fight Ka-50’s and Su-39’s.

Elde 98
12.0 → 11.7
Very limited ammo, missile range makes you wish for more, it’s definitely not a very difficult enemy to deal with.

In the end I’ll say that I would’ve put most of this even to 11.0 but than the chances that Gaijin will ever implement it will be close to 0.

Main goal of this change’s is that we should have some actually effective and playable SPAA’s at 11.3, as current situation of 2S6 vs Roland’s makes no sense.

8 Likes

Unfortunately, this change does absolutely nothing for the UK with 0 11.3 vehicles and barely anything for the US with only 1

Likewise, they have no 11.3 vehicles, though they dont even have any 11.7s either, so… Eh.

Like the others, they dont actually have anything at 11.0, so the likelyhood is that it will be used at 11.7 regardless.

I actually think this is what a 12.0 SPAA should look like

Again, the change wouldnt actually do anything as they have no 11.7s.

So overall… I just think the better solution is to increase the BR of the 2S6 and Pantsir S1. Id say 11.0 to 11.3 for the 2S6 and 12.7 for the Pantsir S1.

2 Likes

All SPAAs in the game need to go up in BR.

1 Like

i dont see the s1 going to 12.7 until we get more decompression for ground, realistically highest itll go currently is 12.3 at best

We should start a trillionaire defense company, develop SPAAs in real-life for the main 8 nations in war thunder and then ask Gaijin to add those new vehicles into the game

3 Likes

No leave Elde to rot

I would be happy if the just fixed the seeker so it was actually on the screen:


I mean WTF am I supposed to do with that???
Not to mention it means you have to point the launchers at the ground to lock low flying aircraft.

3 Likes

This was changed this way due to the launchers on the Tan-SAM Kai shooting at the ground. Honestly, the more technical way to solve this was to allow us to control lofting/weapon elevation through the TADS with a Bar we can control/see next to the radar screen instead of this current issue. Like using a rangefinder and manually increasing it. Oh wells…they took the easy/lazy path.

3 Likes

I know that that has been the excuse for closing the bug reports, but that simply dose not hold water, by moving the seeker up relative to the launch angle so the launchers have to be pointed down more to acquire a target it makes it shoot at the ground more, if you watch the launch the missile it still flies at the large circle until it starts to track and maneuver.

If they wanted to make the missile loft they would just need to set it up like the type 93:


notice how the type 93 with the seeker set to the lower part of the gimbal, throws the missile well above the aim point before it starts to track:

1 Like

Idk why people ever complain that the ADATS is at too high of a br. I can *semi consistently get 5-7 kill games, only ever really getting less if the enemy either doesn’t spawn any aircraft or if they start spawncamping within the first few minutes.
The missile is extremely easy to use (literally just go into the radar screen after firing), the range is useable against 95% of cas players, and the low ammo count is supplemented by an ammo box.
And on top of that you can also use the missile to defend yourself. While it may not always one shot, when aiming for weakspots T80s and Leopards can be a consistent kill.

The real solution to the inbalance of spaa between things like the pantsir and nato spaa is to raise the pantsir in br.

Buffing NATO vehicles in Russian Thunder? Nahh I don’t see any possibility

1 Like

Enough said, skink to 12.7
I think spaa should generally be undertiered against planes it faces to make cas harder, but it should be uniformly undertiered rather than just russia

1 Like

What. SPAA is already all undertiered, Russia more than others yes but SPAA can never be balanced. Just like how CAS will never be balanced. this is because CAS dominates against tanks, tanks dominate against SPAA (mostly), and SPAA will always dominate CAS. Thats why ground players cry and moan about CAS, because TANKS can’t do anything about it (which many can), SPAA is overpowered, people just dont realise they need to play it in order to deal with CAS

Nato also has strela and osa. Also 2s6 isnt that good.

This is curious part.

Do you realize that you will perform even worse on f4e with all those aa being moved at lower br? All of them except us adats will have a change to face US. Plus you are asking for more compression.

What should be buffed is f4e ordnance so it can do the job. Once mavs get ability to actually kill tanks and track without sudden lock drops then it will be on par with soviet cas. Lowering spaa br will only make things worse for f4e (and some other jets) and screw balance even more.

Only because Gaijin couldnt be bothered to add or fix native options. Though that doesnt really change the fact that they are easily the strongest SPAA of their BR and probably should be higher

1 Like

No, they don’t need to be lowered. The others just need to be raised.

agree, there are no jets at 11.7, the adats can’t deal with for example.
The issue is just that they get COMPLETLY outclassed by spaa like the pantsir S1 even the tunguska

1 Like

Today I had a good time playing F-4E, I guess I can close the topic now.

Like you said. When compared to the pantsir S1, the ADATS doesn’t feel like it is an AA system only .3 BR below the Pantsir S1 which reaches out almost double the range.
How the IR system lock on actually lags and the brackets are often offset to the target is a complete mystery.

I do think the ADATS does belong around 11.7
Playing against the pantsir in an under 12.0 jet without a targeting pod and BOL pods is bad times.