Ok maybe you were right then
The idea is already wrong because you blame low lvl players but instead I see high lvl players ODL and you guys don’t complain but blame the new players intead for your lost.
Oof. I remember spading the tech tree F1C. I was usually on a team with at least a couple premium ones and I was always the lone TT version.
1 Like
Hello, thank you very much for participating in this post. My intention is not to mock other players — I simply want a game in higher ranks to include players of similar skill levels.
please consider the matter from all angles.
1 Like
Please read my suggestion thoroughly. My intention is not to ban or mock players — I am focused on balancing player skill levels.
They should really restrict the number of base bombing people in every team.
This^^
Paying customers keep the game free for guys like me…so they should have a reason to spend money. If this makes them a TARGET and not a SUPERPLAYER then the system works…it is even a bit ironic :)
And an important point…if players can buy premiums to play in your team…aren’t them also in the enemy team…and therefore a easier target for you? As long as game keeps it balanced (and afaik it does) than it is a win-win scenario.
Paying customers get to play with shiny new toys and veteran players (on BOTH teams) get easier targets to kiill and pad their stats…
5 Likes
Level does not necessarily mean skill.
And there are some lvl 100 players who have played for a year and some who have played for 10 years. Is their skill the same?
Main issue though is players wanting to drop down to play lower rank vehicles. Maybe they are starting a new nation or have researched a newly added vehicle. In your solution the queue to find a battle could be extremely long, if they can only play against the same level.
2 Likes
Maybe most of the time. But MatchMaker still allows Squads (Clans) vs non-squads. 90% of the time those battles are curb-stomps. Have even been in battles where the BR mix is quite lop-sided.
or limit bases to strike aircraft… or anything really
4 Likes
That only stops fighters from bombing, doesn’t stop the MM giving you 15 other base bombers in their strike aircraft all competing for the four bases.
limit the amount of strikers (like they did with bombers)
3 match making : 1-20 / 21-70 / 71-100
Yeah something has to be done.
Seeing how 10 people are all fighting (and possibly TKing) for bases is really sad.
Sorry for the late reply but yeah these premiums help to keep the rest of the game free, people also need to understand that too. I mean look at the latest Su-30 premium,
Is it powerful = Yes
Is it eye catching = yes, not only for Russian mains but also for people from Venezuela thus making people from that area wanting to play the game.
Will it be profitable = Yes, imagine how many have been sold already.
What I hate is that people keep feeding the notion that;
Low Tier = Low Rank players
High Tier = High Rank players
Like, why the hell should it be like that? This isn’t the usual competitive game where rank is directly tied to skill.
The only thing Ranks determine in this game is HISTORICAL PERIODS.
Like WW2? Play Low Tier.
Like Modern Warfare? Play Top Tier.
It’s not a matter of “skill expression”, it’s not about “experience”, it’s not about “grind”.
It’s just a matter of personal preference when it comes to historical periods and technologies.
“Newcomers” shouldn’t be gatekept from playing Modern Vehicles the same way “Veterans” shouldn’t be gatekept from playing WW2.
7 Likes
unskilled 1 death leaving teammates are reason why i don’t play top tier
from what i’ve seen in recent battles (GRB), after latest discounts br around 10.0 is less playable because team with russians loses every game because they leave after being killed once
i like playing 5.7 - 7.3 because battles on this br can last
best option would be to have matchmaking based on level together with br, but that brings up another problem: “what if i want to play with a friend?”
limiting low tier for low rank players and high tier for high rank players is just stupid and would lead to a situation like “i unlocked top tier in Japan, now if I want to play with other nation i have to buy premium for 70€ because i can’t play low tier”
I agree with you here, but mixing up newcomers and veterans in the same matches can produce widely unfair games for various reasons.
2 Likes
Nothing that can be done about it.
There are 125,000 concurrent players at any time of the day on average; among these, there are;
-“Newcomers” who love WW2.
-“Newcomers” who love Postwar.
-“Newcomers” who love Cold War.
-“Newcomers” who love Modern Warfare.
-“Veterans” who love WW2.
-“Veterans” who love Postwar.
-“Veterans” who love Cold War.
-“Veterans” who love Modern Warfare.
And that goes for Air and for Ground battles. 24 hours a day, over the whole planet, across various servers.
What are we to do, then? Lock Ranks to Player Levels? Forbid “veterans” to enjoy anything but Modern Warfare? Forbid “newcomers” to enjoy anything but WW2?
1 Like
No ?
That’s why some sort of SBMM should be added.
Newcomers enjoying top tier often comes with a problem which is their nonexistent lineups and that will ruin many games, lowering the fun people have as a whole.