because if you would invest 30 seconds to type in lmur missile launch on youtube, you would find out that the gunner is only holding the seeker on target and not controling the missile like a nord
like why isnt everybody just using mclos missiles then if you could just train your gunners better to hit stuff
And yet they didn’t give the AGM-179 that option. That’s just incredibly biased. I don’t believe there will ever be any semblance of national balance in this game.
You gotta love the Russian bias in this game man lol LEMURs also shouldn’t be 1 shotting everything 100% of the time. Whilst JAGMS with a tandem warhead gets nothing lol The devs cope so hard to make Russia look good JAGM early 2000s LEMURs 2020 😂😂😂
Hey Gaijin, if mi28nm can select a higher AoA for LMUR let Puma and Apache do the same. :) What’s up with this double standard? Why add more NATO vehicles that can use FnF missiles but not fix the missiles themselves?
I was talking about IRL. It’s just funny how in game LMUR got the highest AoA while NATO FnF missiles get a lower AoA even though all can choose a top down attack mode with selectable angles
Just another example of gaijin assuming the worst for NATO equipment and assuming the best for Russian equipment. We’ve all seen his “effective” Russian equipment is IRL so gaijin isn’t fooling anyone.
LMUR (Izdeliye 305) is state of the art weapon.
It acts like a nuke against tanks, while AGM-65D, which has three times the TNT mass, scores hits and crits.
AGM-179 JAGM IRL performance is a clear marketing lie. You get 16 of them, because they were designed to shoot four at each target for good result.