As do I, but if being subsonic didnt matter. That then could mean 2 bases per sortie every sortie, and they are already wierd about the 11.7 Tornados being 11.7 for “reasons”. I cant imagine wanting the 11.7 Tornados at 12.0 just because there are more bases to bomb.
In any case, I dont think there are quick and dirty short term solutions that wont just end up biting everyone in the ass
Yeah, I think thats just them fear mongering
The point is being subsonic always matters under the current rules. They would have to change a LOT for your speed to not impact your base bombing ability in current RB.
Also, right now at this very second, I’d rather fly a tornado with 1 minute base respawns at 12.0 or even 12.3 rather than fly the current one at 11.7 getting beat by F4s to bases then dying before they respawn.
Exactly, I swear Call of Duty revolutionises more often than War Thunder. Actually, I think War Thunder is becoming Call of Duty at this point.
Nerfs things that don’t need nerfs (France and Britain)
Implements new things that don’t get nerfed despite being game breaking (Kh-29)
If they finally do nerf something, they nerf it into the ground, making it borderline unusable except in niche scenarios (Grippen and Eurofighter)
Three lane maps (Attica)
Destroying established maps to make three lane maps (Sinai)
Obvious bias for a certain nation’s equipment
And developers that do not listen to the fans, and only cater to streamers that don’t know what they’re talking about
Gaming really is dying.
Right, and bases practically instantly respawning would be that change. Which Is why id opt for more like 3 minute respawn instead of 1 minute.
Enough that means there should be more bases available more consistantly, but not enough to radically increase any one player/aircraft income, but rather the team’s income as a whole
I don’t really agree, but I think the gamemode needs work beyond just adjusting respawn timers
Yep, or something like an RB EC alternative combined with an EC overhaul
A gamemode for RB players where PvE actually has a meaningful place.
The best way to get rid of base bombers is to give more rewards for dying.
For example in the F29A of 12.3 br
There’s no guarantees I’ll get a AI plane kill (Aim-9L), a base (Napalm), or player kill (Aim-7F).
The more things I carry on the plane the more chance I don’t die with 135 mission points back home.
In. 12.3 base bombing isn’t all that reliable, nor is pvp due to multipathing
If I can carry these things with little penalty, why not.
Then we will have airfield crashers and dedicated [suicide rushers] instead of base runners!
F-20A*
Yes. If your skill level gets lower, and if the matchmaker gives you uptier more.
You will have less chance to do something.
Especially when you play WITH YOUR TRACKPAD.
It is a blatant lie as long as every extra armament impacts flight characteristics.
You must think twice before posting a comment.
135pt means you did NOTHING before death in that match.
Why do we need to pay extra to players who did NOTHING?
get a mouse first. I think you’ll genuinely gets better.
More score for things like take offs and landing, sure. Being paid just to die, no. I believe we need to increase rewards and/or lessen experience needed to grind. I don’t believe we should reward people just for dying.
cull the repair cost man. 14K is just too much if you dont have 48M SL lying around.
I have, at home. It’s just that a lot of times I play on phone.
Yeah, it is your problem and business.
if i can perform somewhat efficiently, at the average level (0.651 kb something) by using SARH missiles or achieve the goal of base bombing, or a mixture of both, why shouldnt I play on mobile?
If you stop making ridiculous posts
I don’t care that you play a Multiplatform PC/Console game on a mobile device.
But if you are still gonna spam silly posts because you can’t play a PC game well on your ‘MOBILE DEVICE’ and want to nerf everything to mobile level.
I really want make you stop playing WT(PC) in mobile.