And yet you felt qualified to suggest vague possible measures.
Perhaps you should temper such remarks with some of your new found humility rather than blaming others for pointing out some fairly obvious and basic problems with the.
No thanks.
Obviously it’s a silly notion. Game markets itself as being able to play all these vehicles from across the various decades. Play what you like, when you like, for how long you like. Not that I care what people are complaining about. I’ve played 1000 battles in Flakpanzer 341 since August. Yeah, all my crew are above lvl100. Idgaf. I like it.
3 Likes
when did i say i felt qualified to suggest something? can’t i suggest an idea? is it illegal to give ur opinion? didn’t know u were the smart guy here, pls continue if u’re this inteligent.
so now u’re blaming me about something i didn’t do? tell me, again if u’re THIS smart, where did i blame somebody to point out a fairly obvious and basic problem?
So you suggested something without feeling qualified to do so.
How interesting.
and are u qualified to do it?
u look like a very inmature and toxic person rn, stop.
How would you be able to observe this?
Can you see other peoples crews?
Can you see others tank modules?
Can you see the other players brain cells?
My experience says, this does not happen. If an experienced player faces an unexperienced player, neither modules nor crew will safe the noob. You can’t buy skill here. But you are given the option to believe you could. And you illustrate that it works very well: As I outlined it in a previous post, you are a relatively new player with a strong belief in the payable elements of the game:
You have actually swallowed their hook.
And you display a frame of mind that ensures non-objectivity from the start: You already signal a semantically closed view, by sealing your echo chamber against diverging views.
2 Likes
I play multiple air trees and multiple crews.
I know more or less what kind of performance to expect from certain types of aircraft.
I have a tried and tested way of flying that has proven quite reliable in the 109 F-4 that i know works for public sogfights versus randoms.
I have actively tracked how many G forces i pull in my dogfights in my then experted now ace 109 F4.
And f4u-4 but much as i love it i dont play it as much and it has a g suit built in so less good of an example.
If i then go on to fly yak-3, i-185, c202ec, g.55 sotto 0, fw190 a4 and go on to implement the same strategy i use with p-51c/mustang mkia/f4u-4/bf 109 f4 as appropriate and suddenly find myself blocked from employing the maneuvers not by the qidframe but the fact that my (51c/mustang mkia/f4u4/109f4) is maxed and thus able to sit on a 6G descending turn as long as it has energy while the new planes pass out from a fairly short and quick initial lead turn… much less prolonged loading in defensive flying.
Is that not conclusive evidence?
Only way i could get even better evidence is if i grabbed someone who i can consistently beat at air duels with 109 f4 (chosen as i have it aced)(but are competent enough to hard punish major mistakes like blacking out or accelerated stalls) then swapped to a brand new crew and showed what happened afterwards. I say this because in the duels i flew so far the ability to pull a 9.0-11.3G turn even with a 109 F1 or f4u-1A (rank 2 planes at 2.7-3.3 depending on arb or asb) without passing out is vital for getting an advantageous position on your opponent.
1 Like
That’s the most important point, and no amount of premium currency can buy you this: USE YOUR BRAIN
I have level 20 friends who recently started playing free-to-play, and NONE of them have a negative K/D ratio because they’re generally good players and use their brains.
Plenty of times, even at level 100, I get killed by low-level players; it doesn’t mean anything.
Being high level does give you an advantage, but it’s like anything else: the more time you spend playing, the more experience you gain.
When a level 100 player starts a new skill tree, their crews are at 0; level doesn’t mean anything. Especially since you can easily level up to 100 using only planes or boats before landing in GRBs, for example.
I have seen plenty of level 100s who perform so bad, a literal bot could do better
Level ≠ skill
Conversely, sometimes in Sim air I’ve seen level 20 players with only 4/5 ratios who were incredibly strong.
Weird, for me in lower BRs most players—like 80-90%—still don’t know what they’re doing or they’re doing it wrong. Just being level 100 doesn’t mean the player is good; I’ve seen plenty of level 100s with a negative KD too.
The 6.7 BR with the Tiger 2(H) + Ar 234-B2 is my favorite for completing those 500k wagers. It’s so easy to farm kills at this BR, and I give the enemy team’s CAS a taste of their own medicine with the Arado. It carries three 500kg bombs—not much, but the accuracy is insane. It’s really hard to miss targets since it has a bomber sight but the speed and agility of a fighter…
BMPT-72 and 2S38 say otherwise.
lvl mostly shows how much time has been the player playing the game, it doesn’t mean it’s good.
days in a certain vehicle usually proves how good they are.
+30 days in a plane/tank mostly means that player is not dumb at all.
On what low BR do they show up?
wdym?
Nope, just proves how much time they spent in that vehicle
so how can u determine if a player is good or not without 1v1ing it in a custom or something?
days in a vehicle is the only tip i watched in YT to know if an enemy is a dangerous threat or a complete newbie.
Statistics and conversing with them
1 Like
u mean Statshark stats?