I really wouldn’t understand why people mention other nations on a topic that’s far away from them, i realize they’re in pain, i want them all to have equal MBTs, but please we’re talking about Abrams here and US nation in general.
SPAA for sure, I fully agree with that, but the only other “IFV” style vehicles they would get is more Bradly variants. Only two more other than more Bradley IFV’s than I can think of, and it’s the XM30, and AIFV, the AIFV would be much lower BR and Tier, and the XM30 is a heavily modified Predecessor to the KF-41.
The 5 second reload means that if you engage any T-tank, you well out-reload it, if they hit and don’t do anything, you have the second shot before they can. Only thing that can beat the Abrams is LecLerc, and I don’t even think it can beat it.
These are great things + bradley can get more modern variant the one with Trophy, but yeah it might take a while.
There is a SEP-V.3 with SAAB Barracuda MSC and trophy; it was only a test vehicle, but pretty cool.
Look at this dude.
He thinks the abrams is bad.
Dude you just said the Abrams can’t compete against top mbts. That is incorrect so I mentioned a few other top mbts to give you perspective.
I’m waiting for my man necrons to come in here and slap him about the head with his fantastic abrams stats.
Honestly they should’ve added the SEP-V3 instead of the V2, its more than capable to fix these winrates and bring US Players to go back to grind for it (if it get modeled correctly ofc)
Maybe make a thread about them? i don’t see whats Ariete,challenger,Merkavas gotta do with this topic.
You mentioned the Abrams not being good compared to other top tier MBTs, which is untrue. It is fair to bring them up, when you were the first one to do so.
Forgot to add what MBTs, it’s BVM, 2A7, B+, and another Italian 2a7.
A short cut “Top Three”
Huh? Read what you wrote.
I was replying to that. The Abrams can hold a candle to other top tier mbts because there are so many worse top tier mbts. It isn’t bad by any stretch of the imagination. I was simply mentioning that compared to other top tier mbts it’s pretty good. At the very worst it’s alright.
Compared to the ones i mentioned above its bad, compared to Ariete, Merkavas, Challengers, it’s good, but yeah mostly its against the TOP THREE.
Shoulda mentioned that instead of saying the all top tier mbts. Also of course there is always going to be a worst out of the best as well. I am going to say skill issue mate.
US mains be like “yeah I know our tank is better than most top tier MBTs but it isn’t THE best tank in the game so we need buffs now”
“Compared to every other tank besides the leopard and strv its good”
“Abrams is bad”
You literally just want it to be number one but even then you’d still complain
i didn’t mention “all” at all, i said “other” which is a big difference.
Oh right other as in all non Abrams tanks. Super specific isn’t it? Changes so much doesn’t it? /s
yeah pretty close, other than anything non-american lmao
So wait you are complaining I mentioned non American top tier mbts? What? Because I never compared the Abrams to an Abrams only non-Abrams to the Abrams. I am so confused rn.