If you gonna say anything useful or can be added to the topic of this discussion then you can leave and go on with your day.
3 Likes
I said “from experience” as i know what i’m talking about, and playing multiple nations won’t change anything.
1 Like
Well no. It will change something. It will allow people to look at your stats and see you do just as poorly if not worse in many of the vehicles at ~10.3-11.7 (the BRs where the Abrams is found) compared to the Abrams.
That’s exactly what they’re doing, i mean US is a great nation that can get various vehicles, i don’t see as problem really.
There isn’t much more to add to be honest, maybe the Thumper, but gaijin loves FOMO, so it would be an event vehicle, such as the Obj.292 with its Mega-dart. There’s is Tons of missing mid-low tier things that are missing, and should be added, most arguable before any more modern stuff. To be more than fair, the 5 second reload on the Abram’s is insane.
2 Likes
Is this about US vehicles in general or a specific BR range?
I find the US vehicles up to 7.3 very pleasant so far. But I have no plans to go any higher.
2 Likes
There’s alot to be added, considering the gaps in the SPAA line, and more modern IFVs, but yeah i agree more stuff to be added mid-low tier.
It is insane and whats more insane if it can challenge the other Top Tier MBTs but sadly it can’t.
lol. My man did you forget about the chally 2s, arietes, and merkavas?
3 Likes
I really wouldn’t understand why people mention other nations on a topic that’s far away from them, i realize they’re in pain, i want them all to have equal MBTs, but please we’re talking about Abrams here and US nation in general.
1 Like
SPAA for sure, I fully agree with that, but the only other “IFV” style vehicles they would get is more Bradly variants. Only two more other than more Bradley IFV’s than I can think of, and it’s the XM30, and AIFV, the AIFV would be much lower BR and Tier, and the XM30 is a heavily modified Predecessor to the KF-41.
The 5 second reload means that if you engage any T-tank, you well out-reload it, if they hit and don’t do anything, you have the second shot before they can. Only thing that can beat the Abrams is LecLerc, and I don’t even think it can beat it.
1 Like
These are great things + bradley can get more modern variant the one with Trophy, but yeah it might take a while.
1 Like
There is a SEP-V.3 with SAAB Barracuda MSC and trophy; it was only a test vehicle, but pretty cool.
1 Like
Look at this dude.
He thinks the abrams is bad.
3 Likes
Dude you just said the Abrams can’t compete against top mbts. That is incorrect so I mentioned a few other top mbts to give you perspective.
5 Likes
I’m waiting for my man necrons to come in here and slap him about the head with his fantastic abrams stats.
3 Likes
Honestly they should’ve added the SEP-V3 instead of the V2, its more than capable to fix these winrates and bring US Players to go back to grind for it (if it get modeled correctly ofc)
Maybe make a thread about them? i don’t see whats Ariete,challenger,Merkavas gotta do with this topic.
You mentioned the Abrams not being good compared to other top tier MBTs, which is untrue. It is fair to bring them up, when you were the first one to do so.
1 Like
Forgot to add what MBTs, it’s BVM, 2A7, B+, and another Italian 2a7.
A short cut “Top Three”
Huh? Read what you wrote.
I was replying to that. The Abrams can hold a candle to other top tier mbts because there are so many worse top tier mbts. It isn’t bad by any stretch of the imagination. I was simply mentioning that compared to other top tier mbts it’s pretty good. At the very worst it’s alright.
4 Likes