I wish they would model this and for example Shtora, Varta (ukrainian name to Shtora, if T-84 gets into the game) and Shtora version on some M84 right, these shine the whole map up and give away your position more.
Just like playing Tarkov and your enemy is running flashlights build while you use NVG but its not as painful to look at.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ncMYvsutoHWu
@Smin1080p @Stona_WT how is it not a bug?
-
The overmatch mechanic doesn’t apply here because APFSDS is subcaliber right?
-
The exact same armor with the exact same thickness on the Strv 122s already does ricochet APFSDS because it’s not modeled as volumetric as of now
-
The addon armor makes the protection worse because the base armor can reliably ricochet APFSDS while the addon armor actually allows penetration in that spot which makes no sense
10 Likes
Bruh how is “not a bug” even possible, it’s literally the exact same UFP armour but somehow acts completely opposite of the strv122.
Gaijin cherry-picking what is and isn’t a bug, what else is new…
I’m laughing my goofy ahh off…
@Smin1080p @_David_Bowie mind doing something about TrickZZter’s verdict there? Since as Noodle already explained, it doesn’t make sense.
2 Likes
How is Bowie relevant here?
He’s not a community manager
There is a major misunderstanding here, his response is just forwarded the response from the developer to CBR.
That still contradicts the current ingame situation though and also misses the point of the report
Penetration with addon armor, ricochet without addon armor.
The response makes no sense because the base armor is 35mm and ricochets while the addon is 45mm and is now supposedly overmatchable?
3 Likes
But you guys are suddenly blaming someone who did nothing wrong, and that’s not right.
Create a new report with it, and I’ll forward it right away.
5 Likes
propably the case, because it was trickzzter in particular, he tends to just dismiss bug reports to quickly in general, which we then have to resubmit and then in the same state gets accepted and repaired
4 Likes
No matter how much evidence you will give them they will atill find a stupid excuse to tell you no this is an example
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/rKy9tyRE481C
3 Likes
At times to this i remember back to the wet ammo storage fiasco, were some mods propably just arent that good with the english language
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6slvhzRi0SY3
Spoiler
Russian tanks do have a wet storage yes, but to everyone else it was pretty clear everybody was talking about the carousel. Which ended up in the fiasco / debate that gajin gives russia auto loader carousel wet storage which just is bizarre
1 Like
Innocent until proven guilty, but I think it does call into question how many of those reports have been correctly assessed by him. Do bug reports get directly forwarded to developers or do moderators have an option to tamper with the reports before that?
Ah yes the spinning ammo carousel thats stored in diesel. Yep makes a lot of sense. That totally wouldnt cause diesel to coat the entire crew compartment.
And considering all the photos weve luckily gotten out of a certain conflict we can see how these russian tanks fair irl. And we know the underdog wasnt using leo 2a6s and m1a2seps yet these russian mbts that completely obliterate top tier are being destroyed seemingly quite easily.
2 Likes
Guys, i have some trash information:
Spoiler
This is joking, but something of these may be true
You can tell these leak lists are unreliable by the fact theres no ww2 stuff. Wheres the ww2 japanese heavy fighter?
I just found that and repost there
So “weak” Italy need to be stronk
So is anyone making a new report ? @FurinaBestArchon (that name change confused me there for a minute) do you wanna remake your report? i dont know if you added something we might not see