No, I’ve never once in my life claimed to be “pro”; nor have I ever claimed to “know it all”.
To reiterate my statements: I am not a pro; while I’ve been an information broker in my past, and love to collect information, I cannot ever know it all about anything as I am man.
I will repeat correct information compiled by others added to my collection until an update ruins that information.
I’ve cited people more skilled than I as well as people with more knowledge on many subjects than I.
I never once claimed Mig-29 was OP. Nor did I claim the weight difference was significant.
Pantsir vs VT-1 I’ve shared no opinion on at this time.
2S38 being multi-role is no different to M1A2 being multi-role. M1A2 isn’t a 12.0 just cause it can fire a fused round while other 11.7s cannot.
And Ka-50 doesn’t have the observation & optic equipment of Apaches, this fact doesn’t change just cause there’s a faster longer-range TOW 2 with a proxy fuse attached to the Ka-50.
I have few opinions, there are ten-thousands of aspects in this game. I physically cannot address them all, let alone half. Most of my statements are from others, or just general statements of fact I’ve come across.
And as I stated previously I do not have the attitude you claim.
I in-fact read & listen to everyones’ perspectives, and take into account multiple perspectives constantly.
The fact you seem to have thought anyone can know it all is an insult, no one can know it all.
Apologies that you ended up with entirely incorrect information about me.
This seemingly pretty official brochure seems to imply that the bagel had no AP ammo for its main gun and its only anti tank armanent was the atgm launcher. With its prinary roll being as an SPAA.
Ive also found info stating that the l60 shells are incompatible with the l70 on the bagel due to the l60 shells being precussion primers and l70 shells being electronic primers.
This would imply that the bagel in game would need to have its ap shells removed.
There is also sadly AFAIK no such thing as the mythical bofors 57mm APFSDS.
This weapon mix makes it possible to engage all targets on the battlefield. In reference to the sentence prior where it mentions the 57mm anti air gun and anti tank launcher.
And that combined with all the other info ive found on the bofors 57 variants and their ammo all seem to state that no AP ammo was made for the l70. As it is a ship cannon.
no it says shhip gun as its a dual use gun on ships
also i found this (yeea from wiki i will look more into it
The baseline version of the new gun, later known as the Mark 1, used a cartridge with the same case-length as the cartridge on the 57 mm Naval Automatic Gun L/60 (57 mm x 438 mm) but with a new shape and propellant, giving it an increased velocity of 1,025 m/s (3,360 ft/s), compared to 890 m/s (2,900 ft/s) on the L/60 cartridge.
Which is where the incompatitbility comes in. Not to mention in the site you linked to it states that the navy was not happy with the m50c l60 as it still owed its origin to the ground based l60.
And dual use ship cannon means for baval and air targets as stated in the brochures for the bofors 57 l70. Not naval and ground.
Once again there is no evidence of this being done. And again from the official brochure it describes the role of the bagels 57mm as useful against both armored and unarmored attack helicopters.
It mentions nowhere in any source ive read that the bagels 57mm was intended for anti tank use.
I already said this in this Bagel thread, the actual official brochure says it had AP, APHE as well as some sort of APDS (with no specification of FS of not)
