Still 4 missiles, worse than other counterparts, quite sad
Lets not forget about the fact GR7 and 5F both have MAWS, but instead they went and added it to the F111 which was released now and not one year ago
I think they’re doing a practical test of MAWS with F-111 before applying it universally in the December update.
Which is quite sad approach considering how good RDY should be in this game but it doesnt even come close to its real life performance and still lacks certain radar modes.
İts nothing but a shame.
I’ve gone full IR on most jets for the past few months cause radar missiles are just easier to defeat.
ARHs will make me like radar missiles again probably.
Eh.
İ still use Sparrow on my Barak-II and one R27ER on my SMT at least.
Cause in some situations it can come in handy.
Consider most of the map are dog sh*t CQC Leopard really need heavy hull armor upgrade.
How can someone be so confident yet so wrong at the same time.
Here have some examples
Video evidence of faster reload yet its denied.
https://youtu.be/o5iemZOq9jM?si=VKFnFSrp-HdUENuH
Type 10, TKX, TKX-P all having the same wrong acceleration for years
Listed the manufactures specifications of the hull having composite yet not enough data
I have more examples if you want them :)
You guys should argue somewhere else. This is really off topic. The last 20 posts have no connection to the topic
3 Likes
Armor being incorrect is a mistake, not artificial nor a nerf.
Acceleration being incorrect is a flaw in the simulations, a mistake/limitation, not artificial nor a nerf.
Reloads are exempt, which you’d know if you read the posts here.
Italy has their own advisor, and not accepting a historical report is not artificial nor a nerf.
Everything you posted is not artificial, nor nerfs.
At worst they’re incorrect, which proves my claim correct.
And of course these mistakes, which everyone here agrees they are mistaken knowledge, and I agree with them, should be fixed as evidence is provided.
Was gonna say. This is really getting annoying because of one specific individual. One who lies and spreads disinformation constantly on german topics.
5 Likes
I really don’t understand why this is happening in German technology, on both forums
1 Like
Mobility, turret traverse, reload, upper front plate, etc.
Is the Abrams turret cheeks still weak as well?
Leopard 2s with a double nerf to their mantlets:
Bonjour
6 Likes
I keep forgetting about that one.
One of the gimmicks of the Leopard isn’t even that good because it would be to frustrating to fight hull down.
It’s the only MBT in the game with an additional spall modifier nerf on top of that. This nerf is Leopard 2 exclusive, tailor made to make it worse hull down.
Then there’s the actual modifiers, it uses the same armour all around the turret (at least in real life), but for some reason the KE modifier is just 0.2, for the NERA blocks next to the mantlet, it’s 0.6 and the cheeks are ~0.75 overall. All of them should be ~0.75x…
1 Like
Yo what about skyranger 30 as a aaa around 10.0? Maybe 9.3?
Maybe If still implemented ahead normally
The final skyranger plans are being done currently, the prototype is supposed to come at the end of next year i think? and a early version to come shortly after another year or 2 later the skyrangers will then be upgraded to the final standards. with working AHEAD + stinger/mistral it would propably a better otomatic for the close air surveilance, would expect 10.3-11.0 propably
Yeah a 30mm spaa would be useless if the anti air round isnt even usable.
If they cant make it so the gun functions like a naval gun constantly ranging the target in irst mode then just change AHEAD to work like hevt.
They removed Puma’s ATT. Goodbye any sort of anti-air capability - especially since AHEAD still sucks.
Gaijin is truly amazing;
- accept ~30 or so bug reports on the Puma
- do nothing about them for a year and a half
- then fucking nerf the Puma 18 months down the line just cus you can
- profit
Cool.