exactly the same as the copy and paste model of the Leoapard 2A5 and PSO.
Yes, we all know it, the same vehicle and yet somehow not.
It’s also interesting that my post was deleted by a “Staff”, where I drew attention to a cheater who also drives Russian tanks.
But there are also coincidences, every day in every second round.
East germany had the pt76b with 2 axis stabilizer aswell (the one in the soviet tree). Gaijin could add the command variant of east germany which would be a little bit more unique.
A m41 with only solid shot would be possible aswell like they added into the chinese tree
they could get the alvis saladin aswell with 80mm pen hesh at 4.3/4.7.
spähpanzer kurz wouldn’t be that bad at 5.0 now with many heavys moved up and there are many more auto cannon options
Yeah no, im not stupid enough to ask for a british tank before britain likely never gets it.
And even with a stabilizer the pt76 isnt as good a choice as just bringing up the puma.
Did germany ever use the base model m41 with no apds or heat? I wouldnt want gaijin to be hypocritical and give germany something they didnt use.
Well unlike the Puma the PT-76 was actually made…
Excuse me what? One of germanys most mass produced ww2 support vehicles was never made? You must be getting your tanks confused.
You are absolutely correct as I was thinking of the Leopard…
My bad, I genuinely don’t know what was happening in my head
Also isnt the whole point at least in gaijins opinion to use paper vehicles and unfinished vehicles only to fill gaps in tech trees. Like the gap in the german tech tree?
But honestly this is a live service game, at some point theyll have no choice but to add paper vehicles because theres a limited amount of real ones. Unless they start adding troop carriers and repair vehicles (thats highly unlikely though)
Only Italy gets the Lynx?
Lynx got it from Ungeria not Italy, which then Ungeria in the game is a nation within Italy is another matter, but as you wrote your post it sounds like Italy stole Lynx from you, which I’m sorry to tell you but, it’s not what you think.
There are many vehicles which are limited by the ammo choice especially japan has many of these vehicles. Taiwan probably didn’t use a m41 with only solid shot aswell but they got one.
Yeah no, im not stupid enough to ask for a british tank before britain likely never gets it.
And? Britain and Germany could get them at the same time or Germany could even get it an update later. It was used by the german bundesgrenzschutz with 100 vehicles and is a valid option.
And even with a stabilizer the pt76 isnt as good a choice as just bringing up the puma.
A pt76b is better than the puma just because it’s rank 3 and can be used for tasks. People who claim the pt76b is bad have a skill issue in general and need to learn what it means to support a team. The same people probably cry about the btr80 aswell. The pt76b is good after the reload buff and people need to learn not to shoot the same spot over and over again but aim for ammo or crew members
The pt76 is not a good tank, its better than it was but in no way shape or form is it good. I play mainly light tanks and the pt76 is just gross. I can kill tanks at 6.7 with the puma and have even gotten aces at 6.7. I would take the puma over the pt76 anyday.
Well, it gets completely blown out of the water by the Pt-76-57 which is severly gatekept. Due to this unfairness, it is pretty much mandatory to hate the free Pt-76.
122s have some very obvious differences, while all 2A4s in the game have same mobility, armor, darts, optics, etc.
If everyone started posting about people they believe are cheating, forums would surely implode from the sheer amount of posts.
Use in-game function to report players, this has been said countless times.
I’m sorry but you’ve gone off-topic yet again.
Everything points at the fact 2A4s can and will perform without an issue at 10.3.
Guess what I do almost every day with players where it’s clear they’re cheating!
Now guess how interested Gaijin is, zero 0
im sorry but that sound’s more like a you problem and not like some huge mass of cheaters
i counted 3 in over 5k hours + the hours that aren’t on steam…
Simulator Battle Yesterday.
It must be my fault that I have this every day.
Edit: this Gamer is not Banned and continues to ruin the game for others.
So apparently the pumas pmc287 has not only an incorrect muzzle velocity but also an incorrect projectile weight. Muzzle velocity is listed as 1430m/s not 1405m/s. And projectile weight should be more than double at 220 grams.
thats not PMC287, as you can read in the document itself, its M928
this is PMC287, so mv is correct and it was already tried to buff the mass but only to about 160g iirc (235g is the whole projectile with fins etc. and WT only uses the core mass of the penetrator).
Dont different nations use different names for the same rounds?
And ok perhaps they are different, the puma can still fire this round and giving it a slightly better round would make sense balance wise. Like every other tank with ahistorical ammo.
And the round for the 2a42 which is not called its russian name in this ammo catalogue has it labelled as m929. Yet for some reason it has the exact same stats as the bmp2ms apfsds in game. 1260m/s and >50mm rha @ 60° @ 1000m.
So it makes me wonder which source they used for these rounds.
And the Show goes on
Gaijin has no interest in taking him out of circulation.
PCM 287 came from Rheinmetall (primary developer).
M929 is from MECAR which is Belgian.
