That’s why we decided to stop the discussion about that, since that pretty much comes to personal preference and playstyles.
BVM is really potent in the hands of someone experienced, but has some inherent flaws that might catch newbs off guard, which was my point when comparing it’s “ease of play” with Swedish 122s for example.
I mean there is no other explanation for that sudden spike in WRs, either TS is complete garbage and should be laughed at or I was right from the start, saying that so many experienced players flocked to Russia because of their extensive lineups, thus inflating WRs and making that nation look hilariously OP in the process.
In my opinion, Germany getting +15% WR in a matter of a month right after the not-so-welcomed addition of PSO doesn’t make any sense, at least from machinery point of view, since that thing adds absolutely nothing new to the table.
Nothing that is volatile as TS shouldn’t be trusted, ever.
Say that to my Swedish top tier playing almost exclusively against Russia and still performing fine.
I guess there’s no need to add that yet.
I wondering, have you been living under a rock my mate, because Russia has been de-crowned as the best major nation, at least when you look at the WRs on that “totally accurate” site which many people like to quote when calling for bias and OP.
Russian mains really should be embarrassed between the Helicopters, T-80BVM, 2S38, Pantsir, etc…
not only do that get their literal newest vehicles, but they artificially buff them on top of it. (And nobody can have the AH-64E because it might be over powered with those fire and forget missiles everyone else has…but here’s a Blackhawk!)
I went to the Munster Tank Museum to check some basic stats of the Puma and take some photos. It has not been fitted with the final armor package, but the base chassis should be identical.
yeah its not possible, besides that the main problem is rather that gajin knows rough protection values of the vehicles but is missing so much information (the already existing bug reports) that they need to artificaly increase those numbers to get to the stated protection values or just got them plain wrong
Das kannst du Dir auch sparen.
Der Fehler wird im besten Fall akzepptiert, aber nicht geändert oder Du kannst Jahre drauf warten.
Der Puma ist mit einer der Panzer im Spiel, der mit jeder BR Anppassung verschlechtert wurde, während andere Fahrzeuge die Fähigkeiten vom Puma erhalten haben.
You can save yourself the trouble.
The mistake will be acknowledged in the best case, but will not be changed or you gotta wait years for it.
The Puma is one of the tanks in the game, who got worse and worse with every BR change, while other vehicles gained the abilities of the Puma
I understand english, but deutsche a bit hard for me. I’m trying to improve it, but don’t have much time for that.
Translator is a good thing, but that can do mistakes
funny thing is they pretty much are the same tank, 2a6ex is the prototype that got turned into the spanish 2E, the PSO-VT or Leopard 2 TVM (Truppenversuchsmuster) basicaly a Strv 122
So marder 2 have 1 full working prototype as i know and it standing in museum. About Leo ex and e i have read about (so we finally can have ophellius-p in gunner optics?) .Leo 2a6e as leo 2a6hel made with base of ex, but have 1500 h.p. , leo 2a6ex have twm max and 1650 h. p. aboard,is it true ?
The 2A6EX uses the same chassis as the PSO, so 1630hp. It has better armour than the Strv 122 but still only gen 1 gunner thermals. The 2E and 2A6HEL are mostly the same tanks and based on the 2A6EX. They use gen 2 thermals for both the commander and gunner and retain the same high level of protection. However, they have just 1500hp because they dropped the Europowerpack.
The TVM max has 1500hp, since it didn’t use the Europowerpack.
That´s why I prefer the 2E or the 2A6HEL before the 2A6EX. Improved thermals (Germany urgently needs them) and improved armour (even better than a 122A or 122B).
