Theres no reason why we should have basically 3 turm iiis at almost the same br. I think the turm 3 uses a similar modification of the l7a3 as the super low recoil testbed so i doubt it was designed to fire apfsds.
make the suggestion, I will support it!
I remembered why I never touch air RB on the Tornado, literal waste of time. At least it’s decent on sim as a grinder but, like how can Gaijin look at this awful aircraft and have it be forced to compete with Mig-23s (which steal bases with napalm) and AIM-7F aircraft like F4-J or the 11.7 Tornado having to fight F-18C early.
Like wtf, even a prop fighter can defeat this brick. It has no place in air RB, can’t even compete on ground RB, totally irrelevant.
Like it has no sensors, can’t see ADATS or S1 track radar, and it sees 12.0 uptiers 90% of the time, the 11.3 Tornado should drop to 10.3 in ground RB, where it would face stuff like the OSA, 2S6 and Roland 3, which would be fair for it, and LJDAMs are trash compared to anything else at that BR like the A-10A with AGM-65G or B, or Kh-25ML.
I just noticed some changes to leo 2’s on the dev server.
They increased the size of the fcs by quite a lot:
Spoiler
(on dev)
Spoiler
(on live)
this means that the fcs can be easily taken out from the front
Spoiler
(on live)
Does anybody know if this is supposed to be like this or is gaijin silently nerfing the leo 2 again?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Good to know, didnt see the change anywhere in the changelogs thats why i asked. Also didnt gaijin say that they were going to rework the leo 2 armor like a year and a half ago?
They also say they model vehicles to be “on par with real life equivalents”, but people lie, ya know?
Lol. Gaijin will never “rework” anything, they only said that to get people to calm down. They don’t care unless it brings them fat stacks of cash.
2 Likes