I really hate the philosophy they’ve been using. Instead of properly representing the capabilities of western vehicles and slightly buffing soviet tanks so they’re more competitive, all they do is nerf the western ones to the point where they’re nearly as sh*t as the soviet counterparts
Maybe in the case of Strv 122s, but when it comes to the 2A7 HU, I’ve noticed that the angle’s irrelevant and the breach eats up all the spall (both in matches and in controlled environments).
I’ve been also told that 2A7 HU has received an updated DM for the breach, which might explain the difference. The question is, however, why only the 2A7 HU and not the 2A7V?
At this point just grind Italy. The 2A7 HU is on track to receive all of the fixes promised for the 2A7V before the 2A7V receives them it seems + their helis & jets are better. KF 41 is arguably also better than the Puma. The only thing Germany has going for it is that they get more Leo 2s in a single line-up, and a better SPAA.
This is irrespective of their actual BR. I take all IFVs that I can to top tier, there, the KF 41 is arguably better.
Same cannon? Check.
Same useless armour? Check.
Same non-existent survivability? Check.
Is it 1kph faster? Yes.
Does it have 2 sometimes useable ATGMS? Yes.
Yes, and the puma can actually survive things. You can poke your turret out of cover in the puma without instantly losing 2 crew members or dying because of an ammo detonation.
You can poke your turret out of cover in the puma without instantly losing 2 crew members or dying because of an ammo detonation.
That’s actually hillarious, because my Puma has been dying to turret detonations. The only upside is that unless they load HE and ammo doesn’t go off, I might get away with just losing my ammunition.
Same, but on a worse scale, every time i peak out my turret drives vanish, regardless of the quality or calibre of the shot i still end up losing my turret components