Lets talk about the state of Germany

it was build in mind to uparmour it.

There is three diffrent armour packeges for it.
Unlike tanks that get more and more stuff straped on them and get more heavy the puma was designt from teh start to have teh options. That is modularity.
What you describe are just upgrades in case of the tanks.
The Boxer is modular too as is the puma.

This is the puma modular family concept.
The current puma is not modular thise are just states for transportation etc

3 Likes

Thats just plain wrong as well, since the tanks get redesigned for the ability to take off and on era / rcws . They arent just strapped on and in this case to your “definition” become modular

Thats because the POOMER isnt cool like the boxer. Boxer has the very angular sloped face commonly used as a ramp for r3 t20 soon TM. Seriously though boxer is way cooler than the PUMA. I hope we get all the boxer variations as TT since we got the Vilkas as an event.

PUMA was meant to be an extremely armored IFV that can be upgraded constantly with no issues of logistics in the future i still like more the PUMA tbh specially cuz of the new nipple of death it recieved

5 Likes

Leopard 2 incorrect maximum speed

You guys think I have enough sources?

1 Like

It would be cool addtion if the LEO2A5 woudl get its APU so when the egnine is off it would supply power to the tank instead of draining its battery.

The A6 was not fitted with an APU AFAIK. The Leopards to get an APU would be the Leopard 2A7V (and HU), 2 PL, and 2 PSO. @FurinaBestArchon can correct me if I’m wrong…

That is correct. The German Army’s Leopard 2A5/6 tanks were not fitted with APUs due to cough, budgetary constraints. The only serial production variants of the 2A5/6 to have received APUs belong to Greece (2A6HEL), Spain (2E) and Denmark (2A5DK).

1 Like

sorry, but you’re just wasting your time. Gaijin won’t change it, just like so many other things.
Even if you drove the tank at 72km/h in front of them, they won’t want to change it.

1 Like

yep and Gaijin say no APU´s for Tanks

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/n0gHAxbYRcFn

shouldnt have read your name, its pretty concerning

Gaijin say the Operator for the Weaponstations on Leopard 2 PSO/2AV/2A7HU is the Commander.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/kzj185itPTns

KNDS training Simulator say it is the Loader.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/o2gLABaLz2o6

Gaijin makes her own Wishes and Rules, not the Reality.

lol

They’ve already started adding extra modules to tanks, I think they’ll consider it.

3 Likes

Good Luck

the moment i saw your username dude lol
image

5 Likes

do you have link or offical information on that?

It’s a simple cludeo my friend.

Have you ever seen a Bundeswehr owned production Leopard 2A5 or 2A6 with an APU? You can tell if it has one by a presence of a rear bump on the right side of the hull.

1 Like

I hope we will get this with a potential 3rd batch of Pumas (which is highly likely)

very likely the drone system was already decided to be a thing yes or yes since now thanks to the drone warfare this is a must together with the MUSS 2.0 wich would be great to increase the capacities to defend the PUMA even more