So you want members to be heard but silence them if their views dont agree with yours?
Competitively getting bombed cause Pantsir can’t frag my German CAS.
Wait until you see USA’s 10.0s firing better rounds.
10.0 - 11.0 has some wild vehicles.
To be fair, a lot of complaining about certain biases in game are paired with plenty of insults, so much so that almost any country tree vs country tree discussion is filled with insults upon insults. XD
( I suggest actually writing a review about something you want to say, although a one-liner reaction is more popular these days)
there is not more to say… a 1 liner is enough everything else has been already shown and ignored/ hit with we dont belive in it quote.
Man if only America had a wheeled light tank with an unmanned turret that had M900 at the same BR! That’d be crazy! Or a 10.0 MBT with M1A1 turret armor, gen 2 thermals, and a better round than 3BM60!
Nah man there is only Russian bias as long as it’s NATO vechicle there’s no bias
M900 is better than 3BM60, since when?
idk what part of this do you find offensive tbh
Prty sure it was about the Paton with Abrams turret not Striker
he wasnt even speaking about moderation there, he was speaking about the bug report that somehow got passed with low standards
“This guy said someone that I don’t like. Ban him so I feel better.” Or some other stupid rationale.
no he was speaking about M900 found on the M900 at 10.0, its as clear as water
The 120S has M829A1 at 10.0, which outperforms 3BM60 in every aspect. And M900 is worse, but the M1128 is much faster and has an unmanned turret. Perhaps it wasn’t clear from my wording, though. It’s just silly to try to argue the Sprut of all things is Russian bias because it gets 3BM60, when it’s far from the only tank with a cracked round at its BR.
War Thunder forum moment
What? Run that by me again.
“Challenging the authority” lmao - also didn’t see anywhere in the linked rules that forbid pinging staff?
Also, also, people have every right to complain and raise issue with that awful ‘bug report’ which is literally just a complaint in and of itself.
the 120S is an extremely slow and overall badly armored vehicle because the rather large turret ring makes it an easy target and the hull is not protected either, M829A1 has less spalling because of the lower weight compared to the 3BM60, 120S is in a place where if higher, it suffers and if lower, it will demolish everything, its a hard vehicle to balance, and Sprut never used the 3BM60 in real life afaik. the M1128 its a vehicle whose mobility its pretty low compared to other light wheeled vehicles, and the shell its good at 10.0 but not overly OP with over 560 mm of penetration, and the spall isnt huge either its good but not huge, its a good vehicle at a good BR, only thing keeping it from 10.3 to 10.7 its the win rate of US at that BR
Kinda still off topic and derailing the thread tho…
And they can… you can raise issues and concerns about Bug reports with Tech Moderators in PM… just, not on the Forum that will derail the Thread since it will turn into an argument…
And you can Tag Staff here sure… just not half a dozen times in spamming them… it is the Weekend, and so Staff are not really available during the Weekend… so, if some where patient, then may get a reply after said Weekend…
I mean you’re missing the point, the point is that the Sprut is far from overpowered or “Russian bias”. It’s slower than the M1128, lacks an unmanned turret, and has less armor than the 120S.