Some more goodies from “the other side” of the wall. They will believe in anything that supports their cause (and that cause being nerfing everything Western into the ground).
Here’s a thread by this dude asking for a nerf to Leopard 2s hull armour too:
the fact he tries to attack capitalism and even other people are calling him out for saying bullshit and he starts defending himself by making fun of capitalism or the people who are calling him out on his bullshit, that tells me a lot about him
anyone who tries to drag political “uhh capitalism/communism sucks” sh*te into WT should just leave goddamn. I mean we joke about the Egg Carton Relikt and all but seriously… thats another level.
worse of all is the fact he even makes up blatant lies just for the sake of nerfing the leopard because he obviously dosent know how to play the game, he its the biggest dumbass i’ve seen in the forums by far
well its rather obv that russian stuff is garbage, as you see in rl and shown ingame to a degree,hence the fantasy buffs and nato stuff works as expected, hence the nerfs
but at one point, that it reached it long ago, its just became? more and more obvious that gaijin favours russia and gives them all the handholding they need…
I mean russian tanks are known for 2 things
they are dirt cheap
the stuff they can is greatly overestimated (after all russia can’t have worse tanks then nato xaxa)
they throw the turret when penetrated and the crew gets vaporized…
You see comrade we will model detailed internal compartment for Abrams and Leopards so we can nerf them more Meanwhile Russian autoloaders will keep working under any situation xd
Why every time i get here i get slapped with the news of a random nerf for german vehicles for absolutely no reason what next increase the Br of Pz. IV bc they have good cannons, more nerfs to the 229 bc why not, or randomly nerf the Leo2s armour and mobility for no reason
Nah he’s too dumb for that. He got it from a chinese blog. You can still find it there, you can also find it on the Sturgeon House forum where a user ‘Wiedzmin’ debunked it.
350mm vs KE @ 60° frontal arc vs KE is correct based on available sources, as is 700mm vs CE @ 60° frontal arc.
The arrow pointing towards the turret cheek is at the same 30° offset as the arrows pointing towards turret side protection, I don’t think the author of that diagram is implying the armour only reaches 350mm head-on.
The Leopard 2A4 only received improved intergrated hull and turret protection by the 6th batch in 1988.
Previously built Leopard 2A4’s featured B-technologie intergrated armour packages.