Just looks like a visual correction.
After all, those aren’t the physical models of the round, as the physical models are invisible.
I’m hyped for a 9.0 CAS though I’d prefer it be 8.7.
You won’t get answer from smin he is away for week
Both done.
APFSDS length
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lNEUoEVT0H2y
Composite side skirts thickness
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/76eBc4gfHncF
2 Likes
Oh, in fact, Leopard 2A7V is the only correct one, not the others!
The side skirts are made in TWO pieces that overlap, observe!
The issue here is every other Leopard’s skirts NOT overlapping and being modelled as if one was on top of the other.
2 Likes
Yes; as you can see, Leopard 2A7V’s model is accurate. It’s the other ones that are outdated and need to be updated like this.
I mean 50mm for the backside plate are for me a lot. Visually the plate is a lot thinner than the composite skirt… It can be impossible to that plate being 50mm and the compsite skirt 50mm aswell…
Keep in mind those values are orientative. Ingame, it’s actually volumetric armor with different physical values.
We are talking about the thickness stated. Not the effective thickness. In fact the armor still the same effective in the Live and DEV Servers
3 Likes
Which is why I didn’t call them that.
But they don’t share any of the stuff you listed and are in the same tree.
Is even less that the one in game but as i said before
The difference is that Germany and the Netherlands are two internationally recognized states that didn’t have a conflict for the majority of modern history over who is the the true nation of the two.
Better yet, Taiwan is formally still part of the PRC.
Regardless of practice, this sets more precedent for them to be in one tree without either being a sub-tree.
1 Like
The point is about the modelling; a first, inner layer where the second module is installed in an overlapping manner. As of now, 2A7V is the only Leopard with correct structure.
Also check the KE effectiveness; it’s higher on 2A7V than it is on the others.
And again- check the volumetric values, not the “stat card” ones!
If we’re talking about the model itself, yes, it’s more accurate. However the topic is as stated, about the thickness of the module, which is not accurate.
1 Like
Should be 0.165 kg :P
Kinda funny.
1 Like
I wanted to correct the bug report but knowing how Gaijin is, let them first correct the stated thickness. You did the report about the side skirt thickness? Or you know if someone did it?. If not let me know and tomorrow ill do it
Thanks in advance
Probably 0.165 in the files but only 0.16 on the statcard
1 Like