bug report it so it gets acknowledged this time
3 Likes
So now we have 2 manufacturer sources… Who’s gonna try to remake the bugreport only for TrickZZter to show up and close it?
1 Like
basicly yes
2 Likes
would this (more weight) have a positive effect on penetration as well as post damage effect?
So basically good for both PUMA and KF41 (if implemented at all), since they are the only vehicles using this ammo type.
Edit:
Now all we need is AHEAD to be more effective against AIR, and the Spike (MELLS) armed variant of the PUMA, the S1 iirc?
Basically. Gaijin seems to use mass of a projectile to calculate spalling, however I get the feeling that this will still be regulated even after the change, to prevent the PUMA from getting good again (even when it’s 10.0 with unremarkable armament)
Meanwhile CV90/40s and BMP-2M exists
3 Likes
but muh heavily armored IFV that heat can’t pen!!! it’s op!!! Send it to 12.0 NOW
yes but russia suffers and needs soon some made up fantasy apfsdsnuke to make sure any idiot can point and click with it
god forbid ppl would need to learn how to aim in russian tanks lol
Thanks for flagging :)
1 Like
how is it madeup lol the shell existed the vechicle existed it was tested and even had firing trials so how is it fantasy
Proof?
Didn’t know BMP-2M & 292 share ammunition, I guess everything’s possible nowdays.
Where does it mention BMP-2M tell me
Maybe in dotExcel’s comment that @MuricaxSuffers was replaying to… I guess reading isn’t really your strongest point?
1 Like
Where did I mention the obj292 in this thread ?
maybe you should read again what i typed lmao
Reported using that source.
Cant be 100% sure but development for these started either 11 or 8 years ago. (edit, development seems to have started 11years ago and 8 years ago something about it was leaked)
3UBR11.
BMP-2 (not to confuse with BMP-2M) has 3UBR8
Ty i’ll be searching for more just in case
1 Like