Because it has LESS. The add-on armour doesn’t shatter APFSDS, so it relies purely on raw KE armour value (~550mm to ~600mm depending on angle).
2A6s upper plate outright shatters/ricochet APFSDS, so it doesn’t care about what’s being fired at it. Right now, you trade the upper plate for the beak, this isn’t an upgrade, it’s a trade of weakpoints.
Yea, and a guy who’s got contacts with mods told me that, I actually had to prove it to be better than Strv 122s MEXAS add-on (even though 2A7V relies on a 20+ year newer package, which logically should be performing at least at the same level) for the report to be accepted, lmao.
We “can’t” in the traditional sense. Gaijin is just full of double-standards. Though in my report I provided evidence of it being a “Duel Plate” meant for tank-on-tank combat, afterwards it was forwarded.
great but i know this will come back to them one day and it will hurt them… We have Germans Americans French Japanese Chinese British Israelis and Italiens we are all pissed off
Dude… you just showed that DM53 pens 2A7V more than Strv 122. No need to insult me for saying the same thing.
And BVM continues to get penned by rounds down to DM23, but DM53 makes it easier for turret extremes.
Average turret protection of BVM is like ~460, jumps from 360 to 550 around that Abrams-sized turret weakspot of no ERA.
DM23 BTW:
Again, I’ve always been in full agreement that 2A7V has incorrect armor and it should be Strv 122 equivalent at the least.
Honestly don’t know why I’m being attacked when we’re literally all on the same page about 2A7V.
@FurinaBestArchon
What misinformation?
The statements I made about 2A7V so far: It should have more armor, and there’s evidence of this.
It currently has more total armor than T-80BVM, and less armor than Strv 122 tho it shouldn’t have less armor than Strv 122.
DM53 lolpens much of 2A7V currently.
IDK if I’m missing much else.
All Leopard 2s have an IRL reload sprint speed of 3.5 seconds for 7 rounds similar to Abrams.
There’s no reason for insults.
The penetrable area by DM53 is larger for 2A7V yes.
However, 390mm average turret armor uncovered by ERA might as well be the LFP of Leopard 2.
I apologize if my statements weren’t formed in a way that indicated I was on your side, cause I am on your side. Even if you push insults.
I won’t stop seeking corrections to vehicles that have incorrect facets.
I don’t want to see players at each others throats.
At the end of the day we are both trying to improve the game.
Once again I give my deepest apologies that my statements weren’t clear enough prior.
I am on your side, even if I did a poor job portraying that prior.
i think since its a truck it will be armored enough to be save from 7.62 but not sure about 50cals btw there is a version with a Hard Kill APS on it to save it from RPGs
as far as i know it has only been used for transport of parts or even as a command vehicle but not as an vehicle with arms, but i’ve seen some concepts of it carrying stuff such as the MANTIS AA system