BT-42? Ignored. Multiple sub-tree vehicles sitting in non sub-tree line? Ignored.
39C is just a best example.
Why do you keep ignoring the fact Switzerland has got no end-game for the ground TT?
Sweden actually has multiple Strv 122 variants, produced numerous prototypes (that were actually built) that can be added. They’ve also got their own aircraft industry, so in addition to the sub-tree, their mains lines won’t be too much behind.
What has Switzerland got to show for it? A Leopard 2A4, again. At best a RUAG modification of one, that still wouldn’t be top tier…
What “sub-tree” could Switzerland even receive? Each and every sub-tree has got historical/industrial ties so far, what about the Swiss?
Can and shouldn’t.
That’s a difference of opinions lmao.
2 Likes
Once again another one-off vehicle. Finland also has a Dedicated Line in there ground tree.
1 Like
You better see yourself out, since you have absolutely zero evidence to back your claims up.
I don’t know what to say, stay delusional I guess.
1 Like
maybe actualy watch them genius
I did, it’s full of non top tier stuff as well.
1 Like
Mhm, I guess giving up on you is just for the best here…
And why would that be when the Strv.122s seemingly manage to be 11.7 and some of the most capable there at that.
Most likely Austria, but I can’t be the judge of that.
Exactly…?
ah yes 2s clips
Because underneath they’re still 2A4s with modifications created for HEAT protection?
Do you even know anything about the AFVs in question, or are you just throwing out words hoping something sticks.
Most likely Austria, but I can’t be the judge of that.
So once again… no end game? Congratulations, you’ve managed to combine two countries, where neither can provide an actual Rank 8 line-up!
1 Like
Cope more dude, that’s the only thing you can do since you have zero factual statements to back up your claims.
Also, whole loading screens of the game having nothing but older vehicles in them is also funny.
back up your claim that low tier makes money lol
RUAG can fire all NATO 120 rounds, which can assist in balance.
As far as I’m aware the RUAG package also assists in kinetic protection.
Ruag doesnt exist. Never was actualy produced was only mock ups
Is that so?
In that case that is more troublesome, but I still think a tree shouldn’t only hinge on top tier.
I’d still argue in favor of Switzerland even without a proper top tier tank. Militaries change over time anyways and Switzerland is going to adopt either an upgrade or new tank anyways.
2 Likes
as an ending to this discussion i would just like to point out, that the swiss army or airforce does not even have enough vehicles to warrant a full tech tree.
regardless of what maximum br the top vehicle can be placed at.
due to origins or design and production, the country with the most in common with swiss vehicles (under the context) is germany
I just asked a guy (haven’t claimed anything) how he knows majority of people are interested in top tier only, then you started having a meltdown about that and to prove your point, you started using things you pulled straight out of your ass. Just look at:
- “its not worth for gajin, there is no cash there”
- “the money makers of that update were Mig-29G, F-111A . JH-7A , Type 81 C (btw there u got your top tier ground) , MH-60L DAP , AH-129D and Tiger HAD Block”
So, do you have any factual data to back those up ?
gaijins focus has been on top teir and new vehicles introductions for a while now.
considering gaijin is a business, they do place profit at the highest priority. hence why
because its obvious, but you cant find a tree in a forest apparently