Why do you keep ignoring the fact Switzerland has got no end-game for the ground TT?
Sweden actually has multiple Strv 122 variants, produced numerous prototypes (that were actually built) that can be added. They’ve also got their own aircraft industry, so in addition to the sub-tree, their mains lines won’t be too much behind.
What has Switzerland got to show for it? A Leopard 2A4, again. At best a RUAG modification of one, that still wouldn’t be top tier…
What “sub-tree” could Switzerland even receive? Each and every sub-tree has got historical/industrial ties so far, what about the Swiss?
Because underneath they’re still 2A4s with modifications created for HEAT protection?
Do you even know anything about the AFVs in question, or are you just throwing out words hoping something sticks.
Most likely Austria, but I can’t be the judge of that.
So once again… no end game? Congratulations, you’ve managed to combine two countries, where neither can provide an actual Rank 8 line-up!
Cope more dude, that’s the only thing you can do since you have zero factual statements to back up your claims.
Also, whole loading screens of the game having nothing but older vehicles in them is also funny.
Is that so?
In that case that is more troublesome, but I still think a tree shouldn’t only hinge on top tier.
I’d still argue in favor of Switzerland even without a proper top tier tank. Militaries change over time anyways and Switzerland is going to adopt either an upgrade or new tank anyways.
as an ending to this discussion i would just like to point out, that the swiss army or airforce does not even have enough vehicles to warrant a full tech tree.
regardless of what maximum br the top vehicle can be placed at.
due to origins or design and production, the country with the most in common with swiss vehicles (under the context) is germany
I just asked a guy (haven’t claimed anything) how he knows majority of people are interested in top tier only, then you started having a meltdown about that and to prove your point, you started using things you pulled straight out of your ass. Just look at:
“its not worth for gajin, there is no cash there”
“the money makers of that update were Mig-29G, F-111A . JH-7A , Type 81 C (btw there u got your top tier ground) , MH-60L DAP , AH-129D and Tiger HAD Block”
So, do you have any factual data to back those up ?
gaijins focus has been on top teir and new vehicles introductions for a while now.
considering gaijin is a business, they do place profit at the highest priority. hence why
It cannot. We’re slowly but surely moving on from DM53 level of performance with the acceptance of DM73/M829A3 by the devs, in ± 3 years we will move onto DM83/M829A4 most likely, both of which severly outperform whatever the RUAG can use (and it cannot use DM73 even).
As far as I’m aware the RUAG package also assists in kinetic protection.
RUAG hasn’t shown anything that confirms the package they developed would be capable of providing increased KE protection performance, so at best it’s an assumption, better yet, it was produced at a time when COIN operations were the primary focus of all NATO members, so their primary requirement would’ve been HEAT protection.
