So, uhh… @Smin1080p please tell me that this isn’t what the devs decided on…
This tank is literally meant to be better armoured than the Strv 122 in every single way.
6 Likes
What?
Why not? German as of now has less vehicles that can be added then Japan as Thailand was passed to devs as a subtree.
Why is it that the rules change when Germany needs a vehicle?
Why is it that the F-16AJ was added (even though the Japanese government had 0 interest in it) while GDR Su-27s are just thrown out without a second thought (even though they were in the late stages of procurement)?
1 Like
Germany also received the MiG-29 and MiG-29G a patch after their Russian counterparts for no reason
6 Likes
Pretty sure it was because “the model wasn’t ready” (iirc the Italian F-16 wasn’t model right either but got added anyway.)
UPDATE AIR SUPERIORITY*
*except Germany
5 Likes
Don’t make excuses for the snail, the 9.12 and 9.13 are exactly the same except for the dorsal avionics hump. If they couldn’t make THAT ready in time for the patch then I don’t know what to say. They just wanted the MiG to be exclusive to Russia.
3 Likes
Can’t wait for the Mig-29G to start having a shit win rate so people can karma farm “GeRmAnY pLaYeRs BaD!!!”
3 Likes
I was trying to point out gaijins double-standard as they were fine with adding a incorrectly model plane for Italy but made German players wait.
4 Likes
So will germany ever get to recieve a new plane at the same time as its counterparts? Or will the german equivalent continue to always come 1-2 updates later?
4 Likes
Has this been bug reported?
1 Like
I am gathering sources for it at the moment.
2 Likes
the F16AJ is a funny one because NOBODY likes it CX It’s not the F-16AJ that was offered and tested, nor is it a real Japanese alternative like an early F2 prototype without an AESA. Sot it makes everyone mad no matter what nation they main! Even if it is still fun :P
Mig-29G vs Su-27
missiles: Su-27
Top speed: Su-27
Maneuverability: Su-27
Flares: Su-27
Radar: Su-27
Winner: Su-27
Such a balanced fight
4 Likes
My mig29 watching as the Su27 in front of me flares all my r73’s,dodges my r27er and makes 180, firing all four of its r73’s at me /s
5 Likes
Missiles: Identical. Amount is different, and in the meta loadout that’s just 8 vs 6.
Top speed: Mig-29. 1.3 vs 1.20 on the deck. Su-27 shares top speed with Mirage 2000, F-15, F-14A, and Gripen.
Maneuverability: Su-27, but an amount.
Flares: Both lack. 96 & 60 are equally mid.
Radar: Mig-29G by far.
1 Like
Su 27 has 10 missiles and the radar is wip as its the dev server it should be better then the mig 29s although not crazy good
2 Likes
Radar will remain bad cause Su-27 didn’t get a good radar until later versions cause it relied on datalink from ground radars.
10 missiles means you reduce your airframe capability for at least 2 dud missiles.
SARHs are heavy & after the merge largely dead weight cause IR missiles are far more lethal.
It’s why my loadout on F-15 will be 4x2.
And Su-27 will be 6x2.
F-16C & Gripen I bring just 9Ms.
So your saying that 10 missiles is worse then 8? Lmao do you play top tier air? The more missiles the more kills you can get especjally with r73s and 27er/t
1 Like
When the meta is to get in & out of engagements with as much of your air performance unimpacted, yes.
We’re to the part where reduced loadouts from maximum is meta.
You can only carry 2x ETs and that’s on the R-73 pylons.
It’s not a 1v16, it’s 16v16, you only need enough missiles for your probable KDR, for my I double the missile count cause I can screw up launch parameters sometimes.