Roger appreciate it.
I am aware that you nudged the reports for the UHT (Outer Rockets and Missing Mistral)
but why the heck isnt this allready fixed, like sure there are reports which are more important, but these reports are 2 years old and the HAC gets both on day 1
3 Likes
I take it that the swiss f18 is a much later and more advanced model than the ones we got this update for not just the USA but sweden as well.
Because that is going to be the ONLY acceptable excuse for germany being left out. And any other nation that used it.
A lot of points are still true, especially the completely nonsensical justification for not giving us the lynx
Yeah. Not like the dutch should have gone to Germany based on the logic subtrees are usually assigned under…
2 Likes
Well thats a whole different discussion.
Why is India in Britains tree?
Thats the question. Gajin granted France the German Top heli just as TT unit. While vice verca Ger got the French counterpart added as useless prem without proper ordnance.
Who is buying a heli with laser lock ATGMs? It might be somewhat OK with long range and superfast Vikhrs, but Hellifre…oh dear.
the answer is quite simple
Same reason as for why english is an official state language there
Nope, it’s not. Its the the same as the Finnish hornet but with HMD
Oh good, yeah i can already hear people saying theres no bias. And gaijin saying the german one wasnt ready yet.
And i almost forgot, why is gaijin giving japanese mains so much time to grab the r2y2s.
When they removed the german tanks they said “german tech tree improvements” and yoinked all of them. No multi month greif period no real warning just gone.
Extremely fair and balanced.
1 Like
Given why they didn’t add MLU since it was too similar to the US hornet and it would take away from the unique vehicles the US has the Swiss Hornet cant come. Its literally the same as the current US Model in terms of HMD and A2G. Unless the Swiss made some big change like different wing designs it would fall into the category of being too similar.
So anti german bias. Hasnt been an issue for other copy paste vehicles.
Im just using Smins on words as to why gaijin chose an older Hornet for Finland and not give both the US and the Finnish the same Hornet. If you think gaijin would give germany what they want it would be a miracle to not be given a worse Hornet at the same BR. The US get whatever they want air wise.
So what youre saying is gaijin decided to screw over swedish mains with a worse version but didnt do the same with germany because they knew the backlash from not getting it at all would be less than screwing over german mains.
Or the backlash from screeching US mains because they couldnt feel super duper speshial.
What? Im not gonna treat this as if its the first time for Germany i mean we had to wait for the MLA and the Mig 29 and the phantoms and a lot of stuff. Im just saying i entirely believe its very likely the Swiss F/A-18C will be treated the same way because it follows a trend.
1 Like
My main point was that the US screamed so much over the F15I they got the 229 engines. And its very likely the snail decided to give the Fin players a blatantly inferior F-18 so that the US mains would be appeased.
Even more so info to just add to this. The current plan is to skip the hornet that would’ve been more unique and actually still make the Finnish model on par air wise but it would still lack A2G. Instead the MLU 2 is in the works but Smin stated no current timeframe for its addition so maybe the Swiss model will arrive with MLU 2? Idk just an idea.
2 Likes
At this point gaijin has gotten on my bad side so many times that im losing interest in this game and its future. Theyve done so much wrong that any good they might do now is just a drop in the ocean for me.
The only way ill care about this game again is if i win the jackpot and can infuence its future with money.
3 Likes
Normally I wouldn’t give them any benefit of the doubt for this sort of thing, but I would raise a potential explanation.
It’s been a few years now since they removed the German paper tanks, so their general thought process on how to do that may have changed. For one thing, that was one of the most notable instances of them doing something like that, and so likely they used our reactions to it as an example for future cases where they did it.
It’s possible they’re giving a bigger buffer time for the R2Y2s so that the pushback on them removing it isn’t as bad as it was when they took away the German paper tanks, as a result of them learning from the last time.
Or maybe it’s just another one of their double standards. Just thought I should raise the possibility.
OMG. Since the rocket wasn’t even fully developed, there’s simply no evidence that it can travel further than 4 km. There is proof of that: a test shot over that distance.
Now I’m supposed to prove that fantasy values aren’t correct?
Accept it. The developers copied the PARS, claiming the TRIGAT worked exactly the same way long before development ended, and that’s it.
You know how it is. All weapons are actually only in their final stages of development for five years and don’t require any further development. :-)
I’m done. This is too stupid for me.
2 Likes
There’s no reason to use the French UHT anyways, since there’s a better option for GRB and heli modes.
1 Like