Afaik, the IRIS-T isnt datalink capable nor can it be launched via HMD (since the ICE doesnt have one), so it wouldnt be “as” strong as it could be.
It should still be basicly a free kill everytime its fired tho…
Afaik, the IRIS-T isnt datalink capable nor can it be launched via HMD (since the ICE doesnt have one), so it wouldnt be “as” strong as it could be.
It should still be basicly a free kill everytime its fired tho…
I mean, so is the 27ER. Maybe just limit it to 2 missiles and then increase the amount later on?
F-4F Early used 9Js (in the US). The latter is held hostage with 9Js (everyone asked for it to get 9Ls, Gaijin denied, so that’s not making it “better”).
MiG-23MLA
Can neither confirm or deny at this point in time.
F-104G
F-104G in 1979.
That’s not precedent & shouldn’t be made precedent.
Realism > artificial restrictions.
I don’t think you want AIM-9X, AAM-5B, etc on aircraft yet.
I think it’s something to consider as a form of balance
Perhaps tomorrow can make us very happy. It remains to wait for the 5th and see the 2A7V and the GTA 6 trailer
Still you send foto of USAF F-104G germany never bought aim-9j
Gaijin doesn’t go by “bought”, but by “capable of using/have used at some point in time” (granted there are exceptions such as the French Tiger which was never capable of using HOT-3, never used HOT-3s etc).
VT-1 missles just got acknowledged to be ACLOS missles , so thats great news as well. Only a question how long until implementation Community Bug Reporting System
Ok problem is, this seems to be mainly for the ITO 90m of course… with the croatel system.
The FlaRakRad never actualy did shoot the VT-1 and propably never had the programm for ACLOS, so for all we know german spaa gonna be ducked
The launch rails of the German Navy F-104Gs were actually replaced by LAU-7s late into their service life and the AIM-9L was adopted. Given that it is unlikely the F-104G will be given AIM-9L the AIM-9J can serve as a stand-in.
The only thing Germans struggle with is a skill issue , they get the best starting IFV (marder), they get one of the fastest coldwar tanks , by far the most diverse 8.0-7 lineup with df-105/tam-2ip/turms-3/ raketen. I’ve seen games with type59s and T-55s fighting German T-72As considering all that Germans have the highest numbers of 1 death leavers and tunnel visioned cap runners
Do you thing in the near future br range will be increased/affected based the type of missiles (loadout) your plane is carrying if not I don’t think it’s a good idea to give 9Ls to f-104s etc
That is just bullshit, besides arguably the bmp 1 being the better ifv, every nations has those stupid 1 death leavers, that isnt specialised on germany
French Tiger will lose HOT 3s in the near future, so…
That was never stated and wont happen, it would leave the premium tiger HAP without guided ammunition
The historical report was acknowledged, which means at some point they’ll be removed.
Also the report wasn’t for the HAP it was for the HAD.
Gajin new that from the beginning and decided that for balancing, the HAP cant shoot them either
You have no evidence, and there was no historical reports back then either.
No known knew.
I mean from what I read, here on the forum, the lead mode is shit anyway, while its nice it probably wont change much.
I dont have an SPAA with that, yet, but Im working on the TOR-M1 to see how it is while playing it myself.
Of course there is evidence