Why do we need all those tanks? I can assure you nobody would be mad if they just added 2A7V after the 2A6 and make the rest event/premium.
The 2A7V brings the hull protection up to the same level as the turret by using what is likely E-Tech. It also has the L/55A1 high pressure gun and an improved drive train, which gives it the same mobility as the 2A4. It is far too modern to add at the moment.
1 Like
No T-90M will never be fine as long as there are no counter for other nation such as Leopard 2A7 M1A2 SEP V3 etc
and if they dare to add T-90M and give German just PSO it will be unacceptable and Russia getting enough stuff none stop already it should be enough
and there is Sweden that get more and better Leopard than German which is kinda funny (sure they can have it but so do German)
that three years of waiting and it should not be disappoint.
4 Likes
Gaijin was supposed to add the amx13-105 instead because its more French. They said it would come the following patch. It never did and I don’t know why gaijin being lazy is somehow the German trees fault. Since the amx13-105 never did get added, I think they should get the df105. I just don’t think it should never have gone into the german tree as many seem to think.
You are talking about E-tech but If I remember correctly A5/A6 doesn’t even get C-tech they should so invalid point.
1 Like
Even with 2A7 it wouldn’t be fair. It must be an 2A7V otherwise it’s gonna be another sidegrade this time for 2A6.
The 2A7 would just be a fancy 2A6 btw. It’s only differences are APU, mine protection, gen 3 CITV, DM11 HE, mountings for the PSO’s side armour.
1 Like
The 2A5 and 2A6 have C-Tech ingame, the hull performs much better than the B-Tech hull of the 2A4.
at least frontal armor should be on par or better than Strv122
for me if PSO come to the live Server it should have modification to replace the dozer blade with full UFP armor and Thermal for Gunner should be at least gen 2 commander are already gen 2 which is for me still acceptable.
2 Likes
I agree with you on the armour. The thermals are problematic since the PSO had gen 1 gunner irl. They could add the 2A6MA3 for improved thermals (gen 3).
1 Like
fair enough on thermal then
Yes, you need to check in the protection analysis, not X-ray
2 Likes
Exactly as underrepresented minor nations we have to collectivize our struggle towards Gaijin, instead of fighting each other
3 Likes
No it doesn’t get any additional frontal armor, and the thermos are still gen 1
it has additional front armor, not just on the point where the dozer blade connects, and yes thermals are gen 1 while every content creator and streamer said would get gen 3 which seems to have been a lie, you are slow on the news
1 Like
Let me tell you a little secret - it doesn’t matter what new top MBT or IFV or SPAA Germany gets. Every nation is as good as Gaijin says it’ll be.
T-80BVM and T-90A are horrible MBTs IRL. Yet they’re arguably some of the best in game.
Conversely, the Merkava 4M is the most modern and currently 2nd heaviest MBT in game, yet less armored than a Leopard 1.
3 Likes
Agree i am tired from other nations constantly bullying us when ever we got something good, plus i am tiered of this community double standards i still remember the posts when king tiger players says thst WW2 vehicles mustn’t face cold war vehicles everyone called them german main and insulted them but when T34s and IS-6s players start facing leo1s every USA and USSR main start crying till they increase the Br of every 7.7 and 7.3 vehicles now germany have Zero tanks at 7.0 and 7.3.
10 Likes
Indeed, and I bet if we had a 3 German Tank situation for Russia, all of them mains would be on the fence against the Vehicle removal.
Meanwhile we German Players just get talked down, oppressed and ridiculed.
7 Likes