LITERALLY NEVER had that happen to me! I am the happiest when I see a RU tank since its the easiest to kill
2 Likes
U wont think so soon, u maybe a new one in top tier…
After the update soviets often one-shotted even by HSTV-L round, I’m not even talking about better shells.
1 Like
Taking a quick look at your stats proves that you are full of shit since you do MUCH better in Abrams than you do in ANY of the RU tanks. Most used US tank has 733 battles and 901 kills with 53% WR. RU tank has 619 battles with 469 kills and 43% WR
You are consistently acros the board the same on all tanks. 1:1 KD or just under
2 Likes
I am doing better in USA not prove that russian tanks are weak dude, tell me.
How will you feel about when you get 3 kills and more to take off with AGM-65s and GBUs and shot down by a panstir within less than 5S?
I would feel very happy since thats one annoying CAS less to molest GRB! Also if you cant avoid Pantsir you need to learn how to do it since even A10s didnt have problem avoiding them when I was in Pantsir the few battles I had
2 Likes
Another day of Russia players believing they got the worse tanks in the game for some reason lol
2 Likes
Not worse but not Overpowered as OP says they’re.
I would rate them 3rd best personally along side the Abrams. Leo2 series is hands down the best (I use the L2a4 Premium with the L2PL at 11.3 and its still quite competitive), and I personally prefer my Type 10/ TKX over any of my Russian tanks due to their gun handling and the fact I can reverse. Abrams I find about on par with Russian MBTs, albeit with a very different play style and Challenger 2 is hands down the worst. I don’t have the other nations high enough to have an opinion on their MBTs.
The only advantages that the 2S38 has over the Strf 9040C are its IRST tracking, gun elevation, and its (new) first-stage ammo storage, but it has a worse fire rate. The Lvkv 9040C mitigates the lack of IRST of the Strf 9040C and some of the elevation difference, as well as giving it a radar(better than the 2S38). I have played all the vehicles mentioned, and a higher fire rate is better than a larger ammo pool. You give no reason that the 2S38 is overpowered, only spewing the RuSSiaN BiaS crap. If you played the game you would know the 2S38 is easy to take out, that is if you don’t have the mental capacity of a goldfish. It has no armor, its crew is all in the same spot, its ammo is right in the center, and it is autoloaded which means it has a lot of weaknesses that you can exploit. If you try and attack it head-on using a plane, you are going to get shot down, just like you would facing any other vehicle that has enough elevation to shoot at you. If you want to complain about a vehicle, use actual evidence not just personal attacks and rhetoric.
2 Likes
The so call “Only Advantages” you call, is much more than your “Disadvantage”, dude come, give me a break!!!
Lmao seriously?
Maybe buy it, play it and see for yourself how “OP” it actually is…
2 Likes
buy it?? LMFAO, dude
2S38 is still broken as heck. It shouldn’t be as survivable as it is… especially with the lack of spalling.
I see nothing in those screenshots that are unique to 2S38.
Spalls identically to your tank [I know cause I use it], 2nd shot you missed ammo which is a normal wiffed shot.
1st screenshot I can’t tell, but it looks like you missed ammo on that one as well.
First one should’ve killed at least two crew members, if not, the ammunition rack.
The second one, zero spalling. If it were a STRF, it would have spalled everywhere.
1 Like
You can even see the spall getting absorbed by the fuel tank on the fist one.
1 Like
And we’re suppose to find this ‘damage model change’ to be a nerf?
1 Like
Spalling occurred just fine in the 2nd, it just hit the other side of the hull and the autoloader.
Exactly, that’s the job of fuel tanks, universal on all tanks.
Relying on spall to cover for aiming mistakes will lead to more situations like this against all tanks, not just 2S38.
1 Like