Added report for Chieftains reload speed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lBtAVbqaDEkn
5 Likes
Yaas more bug reports for th3 chieftains
Anyone got a bug report out for the l15 now that its on the shir 2?
1 Like
are you fking kidding.
The shir 2 has the L15A5 round ??? the Chieftain mk5. mk10 and khalid should all get it.
is it also the same as teh L15A3 ? as it should have higher penetration values especially on the angle.
As the core is tungsten opposed to the softer copper cobalt that was in the A3
welcome to gaijin…
1 Like
then they should give the Type 90 JM43, not even sure it existed put it to 11.7 so 10.3s can get a breather.
While were at it, id like to have some APFSDS on my shot kal alef at 8.0
Why? cause its gaijin bro and the ammo is used for balancing broo
Like chieftain missing literally the majority of its ammos , why? cause we feel like thats why F you! xD
sorry letting off steam there
1 Like
JM43 doesn’t exist. JM33 is Japanese domestic production DM33.
Im well aware it doesnt exist.
thats the point in the rant hence the disclaimer at the end that i was blowing off steam.
The L15A5 round should be better than the L15A3 round as the cores are composed of completely different metals.
L23A1 is L23 they are the exact same round, seen someone say about it being a prototype round which it wasnt and isnt the L23 round just became L23A1 once officially in service.
Like why we dont have just an L15 round.
We are in the realm of either using ammo to balance, or unbalance vehicles and BRs.
The cannon on the type ten in theory could fire DM43 so whats to stop them adding JM43, same as theyve added things such as the L23, or for ages had M829A1 on stuff like the HC and click bait which is now somehow gone completely.
They pick and choose random AF stuff to use and not use
the mk 5 and to some extent the MK3 chieftain should get the L15A5 round, the mk5 used it in service and the mk3 could use it once it entered service.
So why on the Shir 2 is the L15A5 round as we know right now the exact same as the L15A3
it makes no sense. why would britain develope an entirely new cored round, new alloys for it, if it was the exact same as the one already in service.
Why is it called L23 and L23A1
it makes no sense.
all of that was the point of my innane rant
EDIT: caveat, the same document they used to nerf the begliet engine power. ALSO shows the begliet was tested with an APDS round. But apparently the same document is sufficient eenough to give the begliet apds but it is to nerf the engine power.
Makes no sense
1 Like