Yeah, hill maps. 90% of what you see are city maps. i wonder which of these two tanks would suit that better?
You must be a lucky guy getting lot of city maps if it in city then the Chieftain will still be a better option due to it quiter enginer the T64A engine is so damn loud I can hear it from so far away which making it less stealthy and again at close range battle Pentraction is the highest the Chieftain still have a better Armor meanwhile the T64A can be easily 1 shoted from anywhere even a WW2 tank can easily pentrate it frontal armor or Overpressure it.
I am interested to know what WW2 tanks could frontally penetrate the T-64
Tiger II, IS-2, Fv4005, Kungstiger, Strumtiger, Maus, E-100 and obv any sweden tank with APDS or big calibre gun HE over pressure and more…
the american T-29,34,30 and T28 and T95 and do you get “Error 405”? it very annoying.
Ok, btw, are you shooting ufp, or where are you targeting? It was my understanding that the ufp was pretty strong.
Also, FV4005 is not WW2, not that it would do much if it penned the T-64 anyways
Hate 405 error as well, I get it on nearly every post nowadays
Lower front plate and upper front plate driver port and if your tank is taller then the t64a you can pen it like in flat angle making it an easy kill.
It sounds like you are shooting very small weakspots. By the same argument you could say the chieftain is very weak as well. After all, reserve tanks can pen its lfp
You know what it mostly depends the player playstyle i guess…
1 Like
Hes saying the t64a has less armour than a chieftain mk3… Im not sure he quite understands what he means by that… i can say a gepard can one shot the chieftain frontally but i can also say it cant to a t64a? and i can tell the guy has never used a chieftain on cqb as he would know corners are not something to scoff at in it.
What world does he live in to think a chieftain mk3 would have a better armour layout than a chieftain? the entire hull and some of the turret is a weakspot on it while a t64a has its lfp and breach? Is this the mythical player keeping russian win rates down?
1 Like
There’s more. I had one tell me the Yak-3U is a “worse Zero”
Didnt know the zero was better than a UFO, those japanese engineers were something else back then.
1 Like
He called the Yak-3U slower than a Zero.
The same Yak-3U that does 627 km/h TAS @ 700m altitude, whilst the A6M5 Otsu does 491 km/h.
1 Like
Some new reports for the Chieftain series’ mobility;
Chieftain Mk 3 top speed incorrect [accepted]
Chieftain Mk 5, 10, Marksman top speed incorrect [accepted]
Chieftain Mk 3 mass incorrect [accepted]
Chieftain Mk 3 engine power incorrect
Chieftain Mk 5 engine power incorrect
Chieftain Mk 10 engine power incorrect
Chieftain Marksman engine power incorrect
Engine power reports are in line with @MatrixRupture’s master report, just trying a different approach.
3 Likes
The T64A IRL could be UFP by a chieftain at 2000 meters mind you before we even made the CR1.
Folks seem to think russian tanks as the person you responded to has, are super armoured…
1 Like
yeah i know
i wonder if the bug report for it closed as a suggestion)))
2 Likes
The only thing worse than seeing “Closed” is “FWD as a suggestion.”
2 Likes
Doubt it 😂😂 not a bug
Or it could just simply disappears with no trace, you wouldn’t even find it in your post/submission history like it suddenly gone, poof disappears like it never happened. At least something like this has happen around here before, some rather high effort posts too.
1 Like