M829A3 is pretty underwhelming
They stubbornly block everything
wait, it doesn’t get IRST ??
Nope, they said they wouldnt add target tracking to all previous leo 2 variants because it wasnt true target tracking, and now that the 2A8 came with a source stating the commander optic has target tracking and fully works in tandem with the gunner sight, they’ve said a lot of things that were debunked, but eventually settled on “not adding target tracking for the commanders sight”.
Before then they came up with some truly spectacularly stupid answers such as the commanders CITV having target tracking doesn’t prove that it has target tracking when installed on the tank, or that target tracking doesn’t mean automatic tracking. At one point one of the BRM said his cellphone could do tracking but couldnt guide a tank gun so the source saying the CITV has target tracking is irrelevant lmao.
Absolute clownshow.
7 Likes
Everybody knows only russian target tracking is correct tracking, comrade /s
1 Like
How about a video from the Norwegian army during the inauguration of their new Leopard 2A8 showing no such sight being in the way but still att the end showing a placard with the -7.xx degree depression limit?
1 Like
You, do know, 7.67, isn’t even what we have in game, yes ?
And if this is about norwegian 2a8, then sure, but how does information about norwegian 2a8 correlate to 2a7v, 2a7hu and last but not least, german 2a8, that may have a different configuration ?
1 Like
well, i knew about the denial for the older Leopards but i thought at least the A8 would get it. and here i thought that DM11 is finaly useful… :(
Great source, small mistake you’ve made, that source doesnt match the source the devs are using to nerf the Leo 2’s in-game lmao
Well currently 2A8NO & 2A8 both share the “same” turret.
2A7HU has its own? turret.
2A7 has a turret that looks strikingly like the 2A6 turret with more roof room compared to the 2A7HU & 2A8s.
-7.67 seems to make sense with the screenshot I shared as well, as there is still room for a bit more gun depression on the 2A8.
I’m gonna sign onto live server to get gun depression of 2A7V.
I don’t have 2A7HU test-drivable on live server sadly.
If anyone does, I’d like a turret-side-aspect screenshot of it fully depressed in test drive with X-Ray.
Nope, you will continue to have gutted DM11, you will continue not to be able to use IRST lead for your gutted DM11, and honestly, you wont be able to see the helis anyways because the devs are adding MITL for their favourite vehicle type this update, so now the helis can fire from behind cover where you will never see them unless they misplay.
Welcome to top tier GFRB, where not only are you forced to be a victim to air players, but you cant even have the tools to punish misplays by the air players if you arent playing Russia!
Good thing you brought that up.
The DM53 anti-era issue in particular almost drove me crazy.
Do you know how easy it is to fake those screenshots?
Unless they can verify the image in some way they will obviously not accept an image from an unknown person.
To prove my point, this took me less than 20 seconds to do:
(For clarity, the last paragraph in the image above has been edited by me personally and those words were never said by this user)
If you manage to prove that it has been edited i will be VERY impressed :)
Okay, so are we just going to ignore the user’s most important message?
What’s stopping Gaijin from contacting KNDS directly? That way, you don’t need verification.
1 Like
Even so, KNDS’s 2A7V video is untouchable but of course that is not counted lol
1 Like
Mustve missed the part where I’m asking Smin what needs to be done to make the source acceptable, or the later part where I said:
“if its true” being the key section here.
You really just came here to antagonize an already angry community? Seems pretty unprofessional.
A report for changing the Norwegian version to that number has been accepted.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/T9Srt2HhlufK
It doesn’t, i just used it to point out that the sight can’t be the limitation because the number (or extremely close to that number) shows up for the 2A8 even without the sight mounted.
Ah, that would also track.
1 Like
“Contradiction between the brochure and Rule 2.2.2”
Hey
Sadly after several incidents over the last year or so where people fabricated emails and written sources via screenshots in particular, unless a source can be properly verified, it can not be used as valid materials.
Due to issues like the AASM release speed fake source that later had to be reverted (to a negative reception), the devs no longer wish to take chances on such sources only to potentially undo them again later to greater damage.
2 Likes