I mean, my 2A7V uses a 120mm so maybe my 2A7V is a special limited Edition xD
Bug report on the left turret cheek.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FVRZmI452zVA
1 Like
Hey guys. What are the bugs that you already reported? We could make a list just like the PUMA. And which ones are already acknowledged?
If you scroll to the top, you will basicaly get the list, mostly. Start of the thread is the bug list
1 Like
Thank you. I did not see that lol. My phone just puts me right on the last posts XD
They should continue here so as not to spoil the work they are doing on 2A7V.
1 Like
I’ve read that leo2a7v gain a similar ability of acceleration of leo2a4 by reduce top speed. Is the acceleration of leo2a7v improved in game?
2 Likes
Let me check!
0-30 and 0-50 km/h with stock crews at the road of the test drive site:
Leopard 2A4 (55.2t):
-0-30: 03,31
-0-50: 10,64
Leopard 2A7V (64.1t):
-0-30: 03,93
-0-50: 12,97
Strv 122B PLSS (64.9t):
-0-30: 03,74
-0-50: 14,93
Well, I did it quite homemade, but… there doesn’t seem to be any mechanic in place.
3 Likes
Uuuh kinda? Idk i don’t feel like it’s not quite there yet
Yep!
Somehow, it accelerates slower 0-30 than Strv 122B PLSS, but faster for 0-50.
Slower than 2A4 in both cases, though.
Now- to do this properly, we would need aced crews and 100% flat surface for all of them, so this may not be too accurate (stock crews and the road at the test drive site).
1 Like
Check the gear ratio it’s something i’ve noticed for some reason the rest of the leopards have only about what 6 or 8 gears? And for some reason the PSO has 10 gears, it may be a similar case
the main priority should be fighting for D-tech just in case better rounds are coming which will negate the add-on composite, we must push that through at least
6 Likes
This is a Lot, it’s all the info related to the D tech on the 2A7V
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
9 Likes
yet trickZter still rejected it… that guy needs to go
1 Like
Jesus christ literally 3 diffferent reliable sources do another Bug report about That cuz there is no reason why this is getting rejected without an actual explanation
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Q3fsNnFTeN2H
There’s a chance the report might be reopened and forwarded. TrickZZter removed the “Not a bug” label like he did with the ricochet bug (which got forwarded 2 days later).
4 Likes
Maybe some extra info can be put into the report and it might help
Looks like they’re doing that for reports that require new tags.
I hope they acknowledge it at least
1 Like